mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ALP: Data Augmentation using Lexicalized PCFGs for Few-Shot Text Classification

arXiv 2112.11916 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2021cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation has been an important ingredient for boosting performances of learned models. Prior data augmentation methods for few-shot text classification have led to great performance boosts. However, they have not been designed to capture the intricate compositional structure of natural language. As a result, they fail to generate samples with plausible and diverse sentence structures. Motivated by this, we present the data Augmentation using Lexicalized Probabilistic context-free grammars (ALP) that generates augmented samples with diverse syntactic structures with plausible grammar. The lexicalized PCFG parse trees consider both the constituents and dependencies to produce a syntactic frame that maximizes a variety of word choices in a syntactically preservable manner without specific domain experts. Experiments on few-shot text classification tasks demonstrate that ALP enhances many state-of-the-art classification methods. As a second contribution, we delve into the train-val splitting methodologies when a data augmentation method comes into play. We argue empirically that the traditional splitting of training and validation sets is sub-optimal compared to our novel augmentation-based splitting strategies that further expand the training split with the same number of labeled data. Taken together, our contributions on the data augmentation strategies yield a strong training recipe for few-shot text classification tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2021.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  2. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
  3. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  5. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
  6. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  7. 2020MixText: Linguistically-Informed Interpolation of Hidden Space for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 187
  8. 2020Data Augmentation using Pre-trained Transformer Modelscited by 168
  9. 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
  10. 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
  11. 2020SSMBA: Self-Supervised Manifold Based Data Augmentation for Improving Out-of-Domain Robustnesscited by 96
  12. 2020SeqMix: Augmenting Active Sequence Labeling via Sequence Mixupcited by 52
4 more
  1. 2020How Important is the Train-Validation Split in Meta-Learning?cited by 30
  2. 2020Is Support Set Diversity Necessary for Meta-Learning?cited by 14
  3. 2019HARK Side of Deep Learning -- From Grad Student Descent to Automated Machine Learningcited by 13
  4. 2021A Representation Learning Perspective on the Importance of Train-Validation Splitting in Meta-Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 5.

10 papers.