mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating the Faithfulness of Saliency-based Explanations for Deep Learning Models for Temporal Colour Constancy

arXiv 2211.07982 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The opacity of deep learning models constrains their debugging and improvement. Augmenting deep models with saliency-based strategies, such as attention, has been claimed to help get a better understanding of the decision-making process of black-box models. However, some recent works challenged saliency's faithfulness in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), questioning attention weights' adherence to the true decision-making process of the model. We add to this discussion by evaluating the faithfulness of in-model saliency applied to a video processing task for the first time, namely, temporal colour constancy. We perform the evaluation by adapting to our target task two tests for faithfulness from recent NLP literature, whose methodology we refine as part of our contributions. We show that attention fails to achieve faithfulness, while confidence, a particular type of in-model visual saliency, succeeds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  3. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  4. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  5. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  6. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  7. 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 344
  8. 2021Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 232
  9. 2018Explainable Prediction of Medical Codes from Clinical Textcited by 231
  10. 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
  11. 2016An End-to-End Spatio-Temporal Attention Model for Human Action Recognition from Skeleton Datacited by 126
  12. 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
7 more
  1. 2020Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attributioncited by 79
  2. 2016VideoLSTM Convolves, Attends and Flows for Action Recognitioncited by 60
  3. 2021Attention, please! A survey of Neural Attention Models in Deep Learningcited by 50
  4. 2015Action Recognition using Visual Attentioncited by 49
  5. 2018Interpretable Spatio-temporal Attention for Video Action Recognitioncited by 20
  6. 2019Explainable Deep Learning for Video Recognition Tasks: A Framework & Recommendationscited by 7
  7. 2020A Benchmark for Temporal Color Constancycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.