mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Global Performance Guarantees for Neural Network Models of AC Power Flow

arXiv 2211.07125 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2022eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning, which can generate extremely fast and highly accurate black-box surrogate models, is increasingly being applied to a variety of AC power flow problems. Rigorously verifying the accuracy of the resulting black-box models, however, is computationally challenging. This paper develops a tractable neural network verification procedure which incorporates the ground truth of the non-linear AC power flow equations to determine worst-case neural network prediction error. Our approach, termed Sequential Targeted Tightening (STT), leverages a loosely convexified reformulation of the original verification problem, which is an intractable mixed integer quadratic program (MIQP). Using the sequential addition of targeted cuts, we iteratively tighten our formulation until either the solution is sufficiently tight or a satisfactory performance guarantee has been generated. After learning neural network models of the 14, 57, 118, and 200-bus PGLib test cases, we compare the performance guarantees generated by our STT procedure with ones generated by a state-of-the-art MIQP solver, Gurobi 11.0. We show that STT often generates performance guarantees which are far tighter than the MIQP upper bound.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2022.

Builds on

20 of 42 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  3. 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
  4. 2019Safety Verification and Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks via Quadratic Constraints and Semidefinite Programmingcited by 101
  5. 2019Learning Optimal Solutions for Extremely Fast AC Optimal Power Flowcited by 77
  6. 2021The Second International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2021): Summary and Resultscited by 71
  7. 2020Enabling certification of verification-agnostic networks via memory-efficient semidefinite programmingcited by 66
  8. 2019The Power Grid Library for Benchmarking AC Optimal Power Flow Algorithmscited by 65
  9. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Networks for AC Optimal Power Flowcited by 54
  10. 2018Fashionable Modelling with Fluxcited by 53
  11. 2017PowerModels.jl: An Open-Source Framework for Exploring Power Flow Formulationscited by 33
  12. 2020Physics-Guided Deep Neural Networks for Power Flow Analysiscited by 33
8 more
  1. 2020Learning Optimal Power Flow: Worst-Case Guarantees for Neural Networkscited by 28
  2. 2019Verification of Neural Network Behaviour: Formal Guarantees for Power System Applicationscited by 26
  3. 2021Modeling the AC Power Flow Equations with Optimally Compact Neural Networks: Application to Unit Commitmentcited by 17
  4. 2020Neural Networks for Encoding Dynamic Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flowcited by 15
  5. 2022Closing the Loop: A Framework for Trustworthy Machine Learning in Power Systemscited by 9
  6. 2018Fast Power system security analysis with Guided Dropoutcited by 6
  7. 2019Proving Global Optimality of ACOPF Solutionscited by 3
  8. 2022Optimization-Based Exploration of the Feasible Power Flow Space for Rapid Data Collectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

4 papers.