GPU-Accelerated Verification of Machine Learning Models for Power Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computational tools for rigorously verifying the performance of large-scale machine learning (ML) models have progressed significantly in recent years. The most successful solvers employ highly specialized, GPU-accelerated branch and bound routines. Such tools are crucial for the successful deployment of machine learning applications in safety-critical systems, such as power systems. Despite their successes, however, barriers prevent out-of-the-box application of these routines to power system problems. This paper addresses this issue in two key ways. First, for the first time to our knowledge, we enable the simultaneous verification of multiple verification problems (e.g., checking for the violation of all line flow constraints simultaneously and not by solving individual verification problems). For that, we introduce an exact transformation that converts the "worst-case" violation across a set of potential violations to a series of ReLU-based layers that augment the original neural network. This allows verifiers to interpret them directly. Second, power system ML models often must be verified to satisfy power flow constraints. We propose a dualization procedure which encodes linear equality and inequality constraints directly into the verification problem; and in a manner which is mathematically consistent with the specialized verification tools. To demonstrate these innovations, we verify problems associated with data-driven security constrained DC-OPF solvers. We build and test our first set of innovations using the α,β-CROWN solver, and we benchmark against Gurobi 10.0. Our contributions achieve a speedup that can exceed 100x and allow higher degrees of verification flexibility.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2023.
Builds on
13 of 30 references.
References · 13
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
- 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 132
- 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
- 2019Safety Verification and Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks via Quadratic Constraints and Semidefinite Programmingcited by 101
- 2022Complete Verification via Multi-Neuron Relaxation Guided Branch-and-Boundcited by 92
- 2021The Second International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2021): Summary and Resultscited by 71
- 2020Enabling certification of verification-agnostic networks via memory-efficient semidefinite programmingcited by 66
- 2023First Three Years of the International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP)cited by 58
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Networks for AC Optimal Power Flowcited by 54
- 2020Learning Optimal Power Flow: Worst-Case Guarantees for Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2019Verification of Neural Network Behaviour: Formal Guarantees for Power System Applicationscited by 26
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Dual Conic Proxies for AC Optimal Power Flowcited by 11
- 2024Scalable Exact Verification of Optimization Proxies for Large-Scale Optimal Power Flowcited by 2
- 2024Achieving the Tightest Relaxation of Sigmoids for Formal Verificationcited by 2
- 2026Finite-Sample Probabilistic Safety Certification for AI-Based Grid-Edge Coordinationcited by 0
- 2026Finite-Sample Probabilistic Safety Certification for AI-Based Grid-Edge Coordination23 Sep 2026
- 2024Achieving the Tightest Relaxation of Sigmoids for Formal Verification20 Aug 2024
- 2024Scalable Exact Verification of Optimization Proxies for Large-Scale Optimal Power Flow9 May 2024
- 2023Dual Conic Proxies for AC Optimal Power Flow4 Oct 2023