mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Closing the Loop: A Framework for Trustworthy Machine Learning in Power Systems

arXiv 2203.07505 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2022eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep decarbonization of the energy sector will require massive penetration of stochastic renewable energy resources and an enormous amount of grid asset coordination; this represents a challenging paradigm for the power system operators who are tasked with maintaining grid stability and security in the face of such changes. With its ability to learn from complex datasets and provide predictive solutions on fast timescales, machine learning (ML) is well-posed to help overcome these challenges as power systems transform in the coming decades. In this work, we outline five key challenges (dataset generation, data pre-processing, model training, model assessment, and model embedding) associated with building trustworthy ML models which learn from physics-based simulation data. We then demonstrate how linking together individual modules, each of which overcomes a respective challenge, at sequential stages in the machine learning pipeline can help enhance the overall performance of the training process. In particular, we implement methods that connect different elements of the learning pipeline through feedback, thus "closing the loop" between model training, performance assessments, and re-training. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework, its constituent modules, and its feedback connections by learning the N-1 small-signal stability margin associated with a detailed model of a proposed North Sea Wind Power Hub system.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2022.

Builds on

48 of 88 references.

References · 48

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  4. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  5. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  6. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 511
  7. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
  8. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 407
  9. 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
  10. 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 332
  11. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
  12. 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
36 more
  1. 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 182
  2. 2020Challenges in Deploying Machine Learning: a Survey of Case Studiescited by 151
  3. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 126
  4. 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
  5. 2019Safety Verification and Robustness Analysis of Neural Networks via Quadratic Constraints and Semidefinite Programmingcited by 100
  6. 2019Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Power Systemscited by 80
  7. 2018Training for Faster Adversarial Robustness Verification via Inducing ReLU Stabilitycited by 67
  8. 2020Enabling certification of verification-agnostic networks via memory-efficient semidefinite programmingcited by 65
  9. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Networks for AC Optimal Power Flowcited by 52
  10. 2019ReLU Networks as Surrogate Models in Mixed-Integer Linear Programscited by 33
  11. 2019Learning to run a power network challenge for training topology controllerscited by 33
  12. 2020Learning Optimal Power Flow: Worst-Case Guarantees for Neural Networkscited by 28
  13. 2017Optimization of Tree Ensemblescited by 26
  14. 2019Verification of Neural Network Behaviour: Formal Guarantees for Power System Applicationscited by 26
  15. 2021Learning to Solve the AC-OPF using Sensitivity-Informed Deep Neural Networkscited by 26
  16. 2018Verification for Machine Learning, Autonomy, and Neural Networks Surveycited by 24
  17. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Minimising Worst-Case Violations in DC Optimal Power Flowcited by 23
  18. 2021Physics-Informed Graphical Neural Network for Parameter & State Estimations in Power Systemscited by 21
  19. 2021Modeling the AC Power Flow Equations with Optimally Compact Neural Networks: Application to Unit Commitmentcited by 17
  20. 2021OPF-Learn: An Open-Source Framework for Creating Representative AC Optimal Power Flow Datasetscited by 17
  21. 2020Neural Networks for Encoding Dynamic Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flowcited by 15
  22. 2018Efficient Database Generation for Data-driven Security Assessment of Power Systemscited by 9
  23. 2019Efficient Creation of Datasets for Data-Driven Power System Applicationscited by 9
  24. 2020Learning to Optimize Power Distribution Grids using Sensitivity-Informed Deep Neural Networkscited by 9
  25. 2017Introducing machine learning for power system operation supportcited by 7
  26. 2021Learning without Data: Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Fast Time-Domain Simulationcited by 7
  27. 2020Contextual Reserve Price Optimization in Auctions via Mixed-Integer Programmingcited by 6
  28. 2021Capturing Power System Dynamics by Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Optimizationcited by 6
  29. 2021Transient Stability Analysis with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 5
  30. 2021Risk-Aware Learning for Scalable Voltage Optimization in Distribution Gridscited by 5
  31. 2020Approximating Trajectory Constraints with Machine Learning -- Microgrid Islanding with Frequency Constraintscited by 4
  32. 2021Encoding Frequency Constraints in Preventive Unit Commitment Using Deep Learning with Region-of-Interest Active Samplingcited by 3
  33. 2016Computing the Feasible Spaces of Optimal Power Flow Problemscited by 2
  34. 2019A Machine-learning based Probabilistic Perspective on Dynamic Security Assessmentcited by 2
  35. 2020Sharing Reserves through HVDC: Potential Cost Savings in the Nordic Countriescited by 2
  36. 2020North Sea Wind Power Hub: System Configurations, Grid Implementation and Techno-economic Assessmentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.