mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Human-Centred Explainability Benchmarks For Text Classification

arXiv 2211.05452 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Progress on many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, such as text classification, is driven by objective, reproducible and scalable evaluation via publicly available benchmarks. However, these are not always representative of real-world scenarios where text classifiers are employed, such as sentiment analysis or misinformation detection. In this position paper, we put forward two points that aim to alleviate this problem. First, we propose to extend text classification benchmarks to evaluate the explainability of text classifiers. We review challenges associated with objectively evaluating the capabilities to produce valid explanations which leads us to the second main point: We propose to ground these benchmarks in human-centred applications, for example by using social media, gamification or to learn explainability metrics from human judgements.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2022.

Builds on

48 of 66 references.

References · 48

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  5. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  6. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  7. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
  8. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  9. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  11. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
  12. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
36 more
  1. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  2. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
  3. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
  4. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  5. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
  6. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
  7. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  8. 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 314
  9. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
  10. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  11. 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 277
  12. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
  13. 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
  14. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 190
  15. 2021Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answeringcited by 167
  16. 2019Text Classification Algorithms: A Surveycited by 163
  17. 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
  18. 2018Counterfactual Fairness in Text Classification through Robustnesscited by 151
  19. 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
  20. 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 141
  21. 2020How Can We Accelerate Progress Towards Human-like Linguistic Generalization?cited by 114
  22. 2020Leakage-Adjusted Simulatability: Can Models Generate Non-Trivial Explanations of Their Behavior in Natural Language?cited by 95
  23. 2018WorldTree: A Corpus of Explanation Graphs for Elementary Science Questions supporting Multi-Hop Inferencecited by 60
  24. 2018Towards Explainable NLP: A Generative Explanation Framework for Text Classificationcited by 55
  25. 2018Generating Counterfactual Explanations with Natural Languagecited by 37
  26. 2020Evaluating and Characterizing Human Rationalescited by 36
  27. 2021A Study of Automatic Metrics for the Evaluation of Natural Language Explanationscited by 34
  28. 2022The Utility of Explainable AI in Ad Hoc Human-Machine Teamingcited by 30
  29. 2019Human-grounded Evaluations of Explanation Methods for Text Classificationcited by 28
  30. 2017Automatic Generation of Natural Language Explanationscited by 22
  31. 2018A Human-Grounded Evaluation Benchmark for Local Explanations of Machine Learningcited by 21
  32. 2020Beyond Leaderboards: A survey of methods for revealing weaknesses in Natural Language Inference data and modelscited by 11
  33. 2020What-if I ask you to explain: Explaining the effects of perturbations in procedural textcited by 9
  34. 2019ORB: An Open Reading Benchmark for Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 5
  35. 2022RaFoLa: A Rationale-Annotated Corpus for Detecting Indicators of Forced Labourcited by 5
  36. 2020TuringAdvice: A Generative and Dynamic Evaluation of Language Usecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.