Beyond Leaderboards: A survey of methods for revealing weaknesses in Natural Language Inference data and models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent years have seen a growing number of publications that analyse Natural Language Inference (NLI) datasets for superficial cues, whether they undermine the complexity of the tasks underlying those datasets and how they impact those models that are optimised and evaluated on this data. This structured survey provides an overview of the evolving research area by categorising reported weaknesses in models and datasets and the methods proposed to reveal and alleviate those weaknesses for the English language. We summarise and discuss the findings and conclude with a set of recommendations for possible future research directions. We hope it will be a useful resource for researchers who propose new datasets, to have a set of tools to assess the suitability and quality of their data to evaluate various phenomena of interest, as well as those who develop novel architectures, to further understand the implications of their improvements with respect to their model's acquired capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
- 2021QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehensioncited by 91
- 2022Evaluating the Susceptibility of Pre-Trained Language Models via Handcrafted Adversarial Examplescited by 65
- 2022The Tail Wagging the Dog: Dataset Construction Biases of Social Bias Benchmarkscited by 31
- 2022A Survey on Measuring and Mitigating Reasoning Shortcuts in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 4
- 2022Towards Human-Centred Explainability Benchmarks For Text Classificationcited by 2
- 2023Discovering Highly Influential Shortcut Reasoning: An Automated Template-Free Approachcited by 2
- 2024Learning to Generate and Evaluate Fact-checking Explanations with Transformerscited by 2
- 2023Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Text Classification: Past, Present, and Futurecited by 1
- 2021False perfection in machine prediction: Detecting and assessing circularity problems in machine learningcited by 0
- 2024Learning to Generate and Evaluate Fact-checking Explanations with Transformers21 Oct 2024
- 2023Discovering Highly Influential Shortcut Reasoning: An Automated Template-Free Approach15 Dec 2023
- 2023Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Text Classification: Past, Present, and Future23 May 2023
- 2022Towards Human-Centred Explainability Benchmarks For Text Classification10 Nov 2022
- 2022The Tail Wagging the Dog: Dataset Construction Biases of Social Bias Benchmarks18 Oct 2022
- 2022Evaluating the Susceptibility of Pre-Trained Language Models via Handcrafted Adversarial Examples5 Sep 2022
- 2022A Survey on Measuring and Mitigating Reasoning Shortcuts in Machine Reading Comprehension5 Sep 2022
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmark26 Nov 2021
- 2021QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension27 Jul 2021
- 2021False perfection in machine prediction: Detecting and assessing circularity problems in machine learning23 Jun 2021
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metrics2 Feb 2021