TuringAdvice: A Generative and Dynamic Evaluation of Language Use
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose TuringAdvice, a new challenge task and dataset for language understanding models. Given a written situation that a real person is currently facing, a model must generate helpful advice in natural language. Our evaluation framework tests a fundamental aspect of human language understanding: our ability to use language to resolve open-ended situations by communicating with each other. Empirical results show that today's models struggle at TuringAdvice, even multibillion parameter models finetuned on 600k in-domain training examples. The best model, a finetuned T5, writes advice that is at least as helpful as human-written advice in only 14% of cases; a much larger non-finetunable GPT3 model does even worse at 4%. This low performance reveals language understanding errors that are hard to spot outside of a generative setting, showing much room for progress.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
- 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 200
- 2021TellMeWhy: A Dataset for Answering Why-Questions in Narrativescited by 27
- 2022Towards Human-Centred Explainability Benchmarks For Text Classificationcited by 2
- 2022Towards Human-Centred Explainability Benchmarks For Text Classification10 Nov 2022
- 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmark26 Nov 2021
- 2021TellMeWhy: A Dataset for Answering Why-Questions in Narratives11 Jun 2021
- 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?5 Apr 2021