mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TuringAdvice: A Generative and Dynamic Evaluation of Language Use

arXiv 2004.03607 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2020cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose TuringAdvice, a new challenge task and dataset for language understanding models. Given a written situation that a real person is currently facing, a model must generate helpful advice in natural language. Our evaluation framework tests a fundamental aspect of human language understanding: our ability to use language to resolve open-ended situations by communicating with each other. Empirical results show that today's models struggle at TuringAdvice, even multibillion parameter models finetuned on 600k in-domain training examples. The best model, a finetuned T5, writes advice that is at least as helpful as human-written advice in only 14% of cases; a much larger non-finetunable GPT3 model does even worse at 4%. This low performance reveals language understanding errors that are hard to spot outside of a generative setting, showing much room for progress.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1.

4 papers.