mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantifying Model Uncertainty for Semantic Segmentation using Operators in the RKHS

arXiv 2211.01999 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2022cs.CV cs.IT cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models for semantic segmentation are prone to poor performance in real-world applications due to the highly challenging nature of the task. Model uncertainty quantification (UQ) is one way to address this issue of lack of model trustworthiness by enabling the practitioner to know how much to trust a segmentation output. Current UQ methods in this application domain are mainly restricted to Bayesian based methods which are computationally expensive and are only able to extract central moments of uncertainty thereby limiting the quality of their uncertainty estimates. We present a simple framework for high-resolution predictive uncertainty quantification of semantic segmentation models that leverages a multi-moment functional definition of uncertainty associated with the model's feature space in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). The multiple uncertainty functionals extracted from this framework are defined by the local density dynamics of the model's feature space and hence automatically align themselves at the tail-regions of the intrinsic probability density function of the feature space (where uncertainty is the highest) in such a way that the successively higher order moments quantify the more uncertain regions. This leads to a significantly more accurate view of model uncertainty than conventional Bayesian methods. Moreover, the extraction of such moments is done in a single-shot computation making it much faster than Bayesian and ensemble approaches (that involve a high number of forward stochastic passes of the model to quantify its uncertainty). We demonstrate these advantages through experimental evaluations of our framework implemented over four different state-of-the-art model architectures that are trained and evaluated on two benchmark road-scene segmentation datasets (Camvid and Cityscapes).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.

Builds on

34 of 46 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  4. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  5. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  6. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
  7. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  8. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  9. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  10. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,133
  11. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
  12. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 560
22 more
  1. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  2. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554
  3. 2016RefineNet: Multi-Path Refinement Networks for High-Resolution Semantic Segmentationcited by 465
  4. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
  5. 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
  6. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  7. 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 164
  8. 2018Evaluating Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Semantic Segmentationcited by 143
  9. 2018Fast and Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning by Weight-Perturbation in Adamcited by 131
  10. 2017A Review on Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Semantic Segmentationcited by 122
  11. 2018Lightweight Probabilistic Deep Networkscited by 77
  12. 2021Understanding Softmax Confidence and Uncertaintycited by 63
  13. 2021On the Practicality of Deterministic Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 62
  14. 2018Efficient Uncertainty Estimation for Semantic Segmentation in Videoscited by 46
  15. 2018Uncertainty in the Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 39
  16. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Robust Semantic Pixel-Wise Labellingcited by 37
  17. 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty for Semantic Segmentationcited by 24
  18. 2015ReSeg: A Recurrent Neural Network-based Model for Semantic Segmentationcited by 19
  19. 2020A Simple Framework for Uncertainty in Contrastive Learningcited by 16
  20. 2017Scene Parsing with Global Context Embeddingcited by 7
  21. 2020Towards a Kernel based Uncertainty Decomposition Framework for Data and Modelscited by 5
  22. 2021A Physics inspired Functional Operator for Model Uncertainty Quantification in the RKHScited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.