A Physics inspired Functional Operator for Model Uncertainty Quantification in the RKHS
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate uncertainty quantification of model predictions is a crucial problem in machine learning. Existing Bayesian methods, being highly iterative, are expensive to implement and often fail to accurately capture a model's true posterior because of their tendency to select only central moments. We propose a fast single-shot uncertainty quantification framework where, instead of working with the conventional Bayesian definition of model weight probability density function (PDF), we utilize physics inspired functional operators over the projection of model weights in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) to quantify their uncertainty at each model output. The RKHS projection of model weights yields a potential field based interpretation of model weight PDF which consequently allows the definition of a functional operator, inspired by perturbation theory in physics, that performs a moment decomposition of the model weight PDF (the potential field) at a specific model output to quantify its uncertainty. We call this representation of the model weight PDF as the quantum information potential field (QIPF) of the weights. The extracted moments from this approach automatically decompose the weight PDF in the local neighborhood of the specified model output and determine, with great sensitivity, the local heterogeneity of the weight PDF around a given prediction. These moments therefore provide sharper estimates of predictive uncertainty than central stochastic moments of Bayesian methods. Experiments evaluating the error detection capability of different uncertainty quantification methods on covariate shifted test data show our approach to be more precise and better calibrated than baseline methods, while being faster to compute.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2021.
Builds on
24 of 62 references.
References · 24
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
- 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
12 more
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
- 2016Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyondcited by 360
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
- 2018Deep Bayesian Bandits Showdown: An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian Deep Networks for Thompson Samplingcited by 166
- 2018Fast and Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning by Weight-Perturbation in Adamcited by 131
- 2018Lightweight Probabilistic Deep Networkscited by 77
- 2016Statistical Inference for Model Parameters in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 71
- 2020Towards a Kernel based Uncertainty Decomposition Framework for Data and Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.