mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Globally Scalable Glacier Mapping by Deep Learning Matches Expert Delineation Accuracy

arXiv 2401.15113 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate global glacier mapping is critical for understanding climate change impacts. Despite its importance, automated glacier mapping at a global scale remains largely unexplored. Here we address this gap and propose Glacier-VisionTransformer-U-Net (GlaViTU), a convolutional-transformer deep learning model, and five strategies for multitemporal global-scale glacier mapping using open satellite imagery. Assessing the spatial, temporal and cross-sensor generalisation shows that our best strategy achieves intersection over union >0.85 on previously unobserved images in most cases, which drops to >0.75 for debris-rich areas such as High-Mountain Asia and increases to >0.90 for regions dominated by clean ice. A comparative validation against human expert uncertainties in terms of area and distance deviations underscores GlaViTU performance, approaching or matching expert-level delineation. Adding synthetic aperture radar data, namely, backscatter and interferometric coherence, increases the accuracy in all regions where available. The calibrated confidence for glacier extents is reported making the predictions more reliable and interpretable. We also release a benchmark dataset that covers 9% of glaciers worldwide. Our results support efforts towards automated multitemporal and global glacier mapping.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.

Builds on

19 of 81 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  6. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  9. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  10. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
  11. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
  12. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
7 more
  1. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  2. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  3. 2020Multi-Attention-Network for Semantic Segmentation of Fine Resolution Remote Sensing Imagescited by 59
  4. 2021Building extraction with vision transformercited by 22
  5. 2021HED-UNet: Combined Segmentation and Edge Detection for Monitoring the Antarctic Coastlinecited by 13
  6. 2023AMD-HookNet for Glacier Front Segmentationcited by 6
  7. 2022Quantifying Model Uncertainty for Semantic Segmentation using Operators in the RKHScited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.