mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LMD: A Learnable Mask Network to Detect Adversarial Examples for Speaker Verification

arXiv 2211.00825 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2022eess.AS cs.LG cs.SDcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although the security of automatic speaker verification (ASV) is seriously threatened by recently emerged adversarial attacks, there have been some countermeasures to alleviate the threat. However, many defense approaches not only require the prior knowledge of the attackers but also possess weak interpretability. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose an attacker-independent and interpretable method, named learnable mask detector (LMD), to separate adversarial examples from the genuine ones. It utilizes score variation as an indicator to detect adversarial examples, where the score variation is the absolute discrepancy between the ASV scores of an original audio recording and its transformed audio synthesized from its masked complex spectrogram. A core component of the score variation detector is to generate the masked spectrogram by a neural network. The neural network needs only genuine examples for training, which makes it an attacker-independent approach. Its interpretability lies that the neural network is trained to minimize the score variation of the targeted ASV, and maximize the number of the masked spectrogram bins of the genuine training examples. Its foundation is based on the observation that, masking out the vast majority of the spectrogram bins with little speaker information will inevitably introduce a large score variation to the adversarial example, and a small score variation to the genuine example. Experimental results with 12 attackers and two representative ASV systems show that our proposed method outperforms five state-of-the-art baselines. The extensive experimental results can also be a benchmark for the detection-based ASV defenses.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2022.

Builds on

31 of 47 references.

References · 31

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  4. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  5. 2018VoxCeleb2: Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 862
  6. 2017VoxCeleb: a large-scale speaker identification datasetcited by 714
  7. 2020ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verificationcited by 606
  8. 2015MUSAN: A Music, Speech, and Noise Corpuscited by 400
  9. 2017Generalized End-to-End Loss for Speaker Verificationcited by 290
  10. 2020DCCRN: Deep Complex Convolution Recurrent Network for Phase-Aware Speech Enhancementcited by 133
  11. 2020In defence of metric learning for speaker recognitioncited by 123
  12. 2019Who is Real Bob? Adversarial Attacks on Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 66
19 more
  1. 2020Speaker Recognition Based on Deep Learning: An Overviewcited by 59
  2. 2018Fooling End-to-end Speaker Verification by Adversarial Examplescited by 39
  3. 2020Enabling Fast and Universal Audio Adversarial Attack Using Generative Modelcited by 31
  4. 2019Large Margin Softmax Loss for Speaker Verificationcited by 26
  5. 2020VoxSRC 2020: The Second VoxCeleb Speaker Recognition Challengecited by 26
  6. 2019Adversarial Attacks on GMM i-vector based Speaker Verification Systemscited by 23
  7. 2020Defense against adversarial attacks on spoofing countermeasures of ASVcited by 20
  8. 2021Attack on practical speaker verification system using universal adversarial perturbationscited by 17
  9. 2021Improving the Adversarial Robustness for Speaker Verification by Self-Supervised Learningcited by 16
  10. 2020Investigating Robustness of Adversarial Samples Detection for Automatic Speaker Verificationcited by 14
  11. 2020Inaudible Adversarial Perturbations for Targeted Attack in Speaker Recognitioncited by 13
  12. 2013The BOSARIS Toolkit: Theory, Algorithms and Code for Surviving the New DCFcited by 12
  13. 2021Voting for the right answer: Adversarial defense for speaker verificationcited by 12
  14. 2021Study of Pre-processing Defenses against Adversarial Attacks on State-of-the-art Speaker Recognition Systemscited by 10
  15. 2021Adversarial Sample Detection for Speaker Verification by Neural Vocoderscited by 8
  16. 2022Adversarial attacks and defenses in Speaker Recognition Systems: A surveycited by 6
  17. 2019Partial AUC optimization based deep speaker embeddings with class-center learning for text-independent speaker verificationcited by 5
  18. 2020Adversarial defense for deep speaker recognition using hybrid adversarial trainingcited by 5
  19. 2022AdvEst: Adversarial Perturbation Estimation to Classify and Detect Adversarial Attacks against Speaker Identificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.