mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating Robustness of Adversarial Samples Detection for Automatic Speaker Verification

arXiv 2006.06186 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2020eess.AS cs.LG cs.SDcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently adversarial attacks on automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems attracted widespread attention as they pose severe threats to ASV systems. However, methods to defend against such attacks are limited. Existing approaches mainly focus on retraining ASV systems with adversarial data augmentation. Also, countermeasure robustness against different attack settings are insufficiently investigated. Orthogonal to prior approaches, this work proposes to defend ASV systems against adversarial attacks with a separate detection network, rather than augmenting adversarial data into ASV training. A VGG-like binary classification detector is introduced and demonstrated to be effective on detecting adversarial samples. To investigate detector robustness in a realistic defense scenario where unseen attack settings may exist, we analyze various kinds of unseen attack settings' impact and observe that the detector is robust (6.27% EERdet degradation in the worst case) against unseen substitute ASV systems, but it has weak robustness (50.37% EERdet degradation in the worst case) against unseen perturbation methods. The weak robustness against unseen perturbation methods shows a direction for developing stronger countermeasures.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: