mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Why Is It Hate Speech? Masked Rationale Prediction for Explainable Hate Speech Detection

arXiv 2211.00243 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.SIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a hate speech detection model, we should consider two critical aspects in addition to detection performance-bias and explainability. Hate speech cannot be identified based solely on the presence of specific words: the model should be able to reason like humans and be explainable. To improve the performance concerning the two aspects, we propose Masked Rationale Prediction (MRP) as an intermediate task. MRP is a task to predict the masked human rationales-snippets of a sentence that are grounds for human judgment-by referring to surrounding tokens combined with their unmasked rationales. As the model learns its reasoning ability based on rationales by MRP, it performs hate speech detection robustly in terms of bias and explainability. The proposed method generally achieves state-of-the-art performance in various metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness for hate speech detection.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2022.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  5. 2019Graph Transformer Networkscited by 520
  6. 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 500
  7. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  8. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
  9. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  10. 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 214
  11. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  12. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
6 more
  1. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  2. 2018Training Classifiers with Natural Language Explanationscited by 58
  3. 2018Towards Explainable NLP: A Generative Explanation Framework for Text Classificationcited by 55
  4. 2018Deriving Machine Attention from Human Rationalescited by 54
  5. 2020PERL: Pivot-based Domain Adaptation for Pre-trained Deep Contextualized Embedding Modelscited by 33
  6. 2018Predictive Embeddings for Hate Speech Detection on Twittercited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026X-MuTeST: A Multilingual Benchmark for Explainable Hate Speech Detection and A Novel LLM-consulted Explanation Framework
  2. 2023HARE: Explainable Hate Speech Detection with Step-by-Step Reasoning
  3. 2024Towards Efficient and Explainable Hate Speech Detection via Model Distillation
  4. 2022ToKen: Task Decomposition and Knowledge Infusion for Few-Shot Hate Speech Detection
  5. 2025HatePrototypes: Interpretable and Transferable Representations for Implicit and Explicit Hate Speech Detection
  6. 2024Diagnosing Hate Speech Classification: Where Do Humans and Machines Disagree, and Why?
  7. 2026Sledgehammer or Scalpel? A Fine-grained Adaptive Framework for Implicit Hate Speech
  8. 2025AmpleHate: Amplifying the Attention for Versatile Implicit Hate Detection