Scoring Black-Box Models for Adversarial Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are susceptible to adversarial inputs and various methods have been proposed to defend these models against adversarial attacks under different perturbation models. The robustness of models to adversarial attacks has been analyzed by first constructing adversarial inputs for the model, and then testing the model performance on the constructed adversarial inputs. Most of these attacks require the model to be white-box, need access to data labels, and finding adversarial inputs can be computationally expensive. We propose a simple scoring method for black-box models which indicates their robustness to adversarial input. We show that adversarially more robust models have a smaller l1-norm of LIME weights and sharper explanations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2022.
Builds on
34 of 38 references.
References · 34
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,301
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
22 more
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 469
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
- 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 243
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
- 2021Adversarial purification with Score-based generative modelscited by 132
- 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
- 2022SafeBench: A Benchmarking Platform for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 65
- 2018Adversarial Attacks Against Medical Deep Learning Systemscited by 61
- 2019Defending against Whitebox Adversarial Attacks via Randomized Discretizationcited by 29
- 2017Cascade Adversarial Machine Learning Regularized with a Unified Embeddingcited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.