Private optimization in the interpolation regime: faster rates and hardness results
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In non-private stochastic convex optimization, stochastic gradient methods converge much faster on interpolation problems -- problems where there exists a solution that simultaneously minimizes all of the sample losses -- than on non-interpolating ones; we show that generally similar improvements are impossible in the private setting. However, when the functions exhibit quadratic growth around the optimum, we show (near) exponential improvements in the private sample complexity. In particular, we propose an adaptive algorithm that improves the sample complexity to achieve expected error α from fracdvarepsilon √α to frac1αρ + fracdvarepsilon logleft(frac1αright) for any fixed ρ >0, while retaining the standard minimax-optimal sample complexity for non-interpolation problems. We prove a lower bound that shows the dimension-dependent term is tight. Furthermore, we provide a superefficiency result which demonstrates the necessity of the polynomial term for adaptive algorithms: any algorithm that has a polylogarithmic sample complexity for interpolation problems cannot achieve the minimax-optimal rates for the family of non-interpolation problems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2022.
Builds on
19 of 32 references.
References · 19
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 183
- 2020Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Lossescited by 172
- 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 152
- 2017The Power of Interpolation: Understanding the Effectiveness of SGD in Modern Over-parametrized Learningcited by 150
- 2018Fast and Faster Convergence of SGD for Over-Parameterized Models and an Accelerated Perceptroncited by 143
- 2013Stochastic Gradient Descent, Weighted Sampling, and the Randomized Kaczmarz algorithmcited by 132
- 2014Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization: Efficient Algorithms and Tight Error Boundscited by 104
- 2018Overfitting or perfect fitting? Risk bounds for classification and regression rules that interpolatecited by 99
- 2018Does data interpolation contradict statistical optimality?cited by 95
- 2021Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in ℓ1 Geometrycited by 83
- 2018Stochastic (Approximate) Proximal Point Methods: Convergence, Optimality, and Adaptivitycited by 61
7 more
- 2020On Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Heavy-tailed Datacited by 51
- 2021Non-Euclidean Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 51
- 2021Private Adaptive Gradient Methods for Convex Optimizationcited by 46
- 2020Near Instance-Optimality in Differential Privacycited by 23
- 2021Adapting to Function Difficulty and Growth Conditions in Private Optimizationcited by 19
- 2021Accelerated, Optimal, and Parallel: Some Results on Model-Based Stochastic Optimizationcited by 14
- 2021An Even More Optimal Stochastic Optimization Algorithm: Minibatching and Interpolation Learningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Near-Optimal Algorithms for Private Online Optimization in the Realizable Regimecited by 9
- 2023The Relative Gaussian Mechanism and its Application to Private Gradient Descentcited by 1
- 2024Federated Online Prediction from Experts with Differential Privacy: Separations and Regret Speed-upscited by 1
- 2024Federated Online Prediction from Experts with Differential Privacy: Separations and Regret Speed-ups27 Sep 2024
- 2023The Relative Gaussian Mechanism and its Application to Private Gradient Descent29 Aug 2023
- 2023Near-Optimal Algorithms for Private Online Optimization in the Realizable Regime27 Feb 2023