mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Relative Gaussian Mechanism and its Application to Private Gradient Descent

arXiv 2308.15250 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2023cs.LG cs.CR math.OCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Gaussian Mechanism (GM), which consists in adding Gaussian noise to a vector-valued query before releasing it, is a standard privacy protection mechanism. In particular, given that the query respects some L2 sensitivity property (the L2 distance between outputs on any two neighboring inputs is bounded), GM guarantees R'enyi Differential Privacy (RDP). Unfortunately, precisely bounding the L2 sensitivity can be hard, thus leading to loose privacy bounds. In this work, we consider a Relative L2 sensitivity assumption, in which the bound on the distance between two query outputs may also depend on their norm. Leveraging this assumption, we introduce the Relative Gaussian Mechanism (RGM), in which the variance of the noise depends on the norm of the output. We prove tight bounds on the RDP parameters under relative L2 sensitivity, and characterize the privacy loss incurred by using output-dependent noise. In particular, we show that RGM naturally adapts to a latent variable that would control the norm of the output. Finally, we instantiate our framework to show tight guarantees for Private Gradient Descent, a problem that naturally fits our relative L2 sensitivity assumption.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2023.

Builds on

19 of 43 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 664
  3. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  4. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
  5. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
  6. 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 220
  7. 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 186
  8. 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 153
  9. 2020Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 142
  10. 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 128
  11. 2023Revisiting Gradient Clipping: Stochastic bias and tight convergence guaranteescited by 83
  12. 2019AdaCliP: Adaptive Clipping for Private SGDcited by 77
7 more
  1. 2018Revisiting differentially private linear regression: optimal and adaptive prediction & estimation in unbounded domaincited by 61
  2. 2019Average-Case Averages: Private Algorithms for Smooth Sensitivity and Mean Estimationcited by 52
  3. 2022Normalized/Clipped SGD with Perturbation for Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 36
  4. 2021FriendlyCore: Practical Differentially Private Aggregationcited by 34
  5. 2020Propose, Test, Release: Differentially private estimation with high probabilitycited by 15
  6. 2021Concentration of Non-Isotropic Random Tensors with Applications to Learning and Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 4
  7. 2022Private optimization in the interpolation regime: faster rates and hardness resultscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.