A Double Machine Learning Trend Model for Citizen Science Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
1. Citizen and community-science (CS) datasets have great potential for estimating interannual patterns of population change given the large volumes of data collected globally every year. Yet, the flexible protocols that enable many CS projects to collect large volumes of data typically lack the structure necessary to keep consistent sampling across years. This leads to interannual confounding, as changes to the observation process over time are confounded with changes in species population sizes. 2. Here we describe a novel modeling approach designed to estimate species population trends while controlling for the interannual confounding common in citizen science data. The approach is based on Double Machine Learning, a statistical framework that uses machine learning methods to estimate population change and the propensity scores used to adjust for confounding discovered in the data. Additionally, we develop a simulation method to identify and adjust for residual confounding missed by the propensity scores. Using this new method, we can produce spatially detailed trend estimates from citizen science data. 3. To illustrate the approach, we estimated species trends using data from the CS project eBird. We used a simulation study to assess the ability of the method to estimate spatially varying trends in the face of real-world confounding. Results showed that the trend estimates distinguished between spatially constant and spatially varying trends at a 27km resolution. There were low error rates on the estimated direction of population change (increasing/decreasing) and high correlations on the estimated magnitude. 4. The ability to estimate spatially explicit trends while accounting for confounding in citizen science data has the potential to fill important information gaps, helping to estimate population trends for species, regions, or seasons without rigorous monitoring data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2022.
Builds on
10 of 106 references.
References · 10
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 332
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
- 2018Invariance, Causality and Robustnesscited by 123
- 2022Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problemscited by 110
- 2021Discussion on "Bayesian Regression Tree Models for Causal Inference: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects" by Hahn, Murray and Carvalhocited by 77
- 2020CausalML: Python Package for Causal Machine Learningcited by 74
- 2017Some methods for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in high-dimensionscited by 48
- 2019Assessing Treatment Effect Variation in Observational Studies: Results from a Data Challengecited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.