mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A baseline revisited: Pushing the limits of multi-segment models for context-aware translation

arXiv 2210.10906 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses the task of contextual translation using multi-segment models. Specifically we show that increasing model capacity further pushes the limits of this approach and that deeper models are more suited to capture context dependencies. Furthermore, improvements observed with larger models can be transferred to smaller models using knowledge distillation. Our experiments show that this approach achieves competitive performance across several languages and benchmarks, without additional language-specific tuning and task specific architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2022.

Builds on

30 of 42 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  4. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  5. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  6. 2019Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 121
  7. 2018Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translationcited by 119
  8. 2017Neural Machine Translation with Extended Contextcited by 95
  9. 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
  10. 2018Document-Level Neural Machine Translation with Hierarchical Attention Networkscited by 85
  11. 2019Selective Attention for Context-aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 60
  12. 2019Microsoft Translator at WMT 2019: Towards Large-Scale Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
18 more
  1. 2021Measuring and Increasing Context Usage in Context-Aware Machine Translationcited by 48
  2. 2021G-Transformer for Document-level Machine Translationcited by 46
  3. 2019Context-Aware Monolingual Repair for Neural Machine Translationcited by 41
  4. 2021When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Explorationcited by 36
  5. 2020Does Multi-Encoder Help? A Case Study on Context-Aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 34
  6. 2020Diving Deep into Context-Aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 25
  7. 2021Do Context-Aware Translation Models Pay the Right Attention?cited by 21
  8. 2019Explaining Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillation as Data-Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 16
  9. 2020The Sockeye 2 Neural Machine Translation Toolkit at AMTA 2020cited by 16
  10. 2021On the Limits of Minimal Pairs in Contrastive Evaluationcited by 15
  11. 2021Diverse Pretrained Context Encodings Improve Document Translationcited by 13
  12. 2019A Survey on Document-level Neural Machine Translation: Methods and Evaluationcited by 12
  13. 2021How Does Distilled Data Complexity Impact the Quality and Confidence of Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation?cited by 12
  14. 2021Data Augmentation by Concatenation for Low-Resource Translation: A Mystery and a Solutioncited by 11
  15. 2019Evaluating Pronominal Anaphora in Machine Translation: An Evaluation Measure and a Test Suitecited by 9
  16. 2020Can Your Context-Aware MT System Pass the DiP Benchmark Tests? : Evaluation Benchmarks for Discourse Phenomena in Machine Translationcited by 5
  17. 2020Pronoun-Targeted Fine-tuning for NMT with Hybrid Lossescited by 5
  18. 2021On User Interfaces for Large-Scale Document-Level Human Evaluation of Machine Translation Outputscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

11 papers.