Quantifying the Plausibility of Context Reliance in Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Establishing whether language models can use contextual information in a human-plausible way is important to ensure their trustworthiness in real-world settings. However, the questions of when and which parts of the context affect model generations are typically tackled separately, with current plausibility evaluations being practically limited to a handful of artificial benchmarks. To address this, we introduce Plausibility Evaluation of Context Reliance (PECoRe), an end-to-end interpretability framework designed to quantify context usage in language models' generations. Our approach leverages model internals to (i) contrastively identify context-sensitive target tokens in generated texts and (ii) link them to contextual cues justifying their prediction. We use pecore to quantify the plausibility of context-aware machine translation models, comparing model rationales with human annotations across several discourse-level phenomena. Finally, we apply our method to unannotated model translations to identify context-mediated predictions and highlight instances of (im)plausible context usage throughout generation.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.
Builds on
60 of 79 references.
References · 60
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 841
38 more
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 627
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 293
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
- 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 249
- 2021Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corporacited by 186
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
- 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 156
- 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
- 2020The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?cited by 122
- 2018Context-Aware Neural Machine Translation Learns Anaphora Resolutioncited by 97
- 2017Neural Machine Translation with Extended Contextcited by 95
- 2022Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanationscited by 92
- 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
- 2017Evaluating Discourse Phenomena in Neural Machine Translationcited by 87
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
- 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
- 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
- 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
- 2021"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classificationcited by 66
- 2022Measuring the Mixing of Contextual Information in the Transformercited by 65
- 2018Attaining the Unattainable? Reassessing Claims of Human Parity in Neural Machine Translationcited by 58
- 2022Quality-Aware Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 49
- 2021Measuring and Increasing Context Usage in Context-Aware Machine Translationcited by 48
- 2019When and Why is Document-level Context Useful in Neural Machine Translation?cited by 45
- 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
- 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
- 2023Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build Predictionscited by 43
- 2019Context-Aware Monolingual Repair for Neural Machine Translationcited by 41
- 2021When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Explorationcited by 36
50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024ContextCite: Attributing Model Generation to Contextcited by 98
- 2024A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 85
- 2025Learning to Attribute with Attentioncited by 13
- 2024Context-Aware or Context-Insensitive? Assessing LLMs' Performance in Document-Level Translationcited by 6
- 2024Analyzing the Attention Heads for Pronoun Disambiguation in Context-aware Machine Translation Modelscited by 4
- 2024A Context-aware Framework for Translation-mediated Conversationscited by 2
- 2026Faithfulness Without Anchors: A Position Paper on the Structural Misalignments of Explainable AI Faithfulness Metrics for Feature Importancecited by 0
- 2026Faithfulness Without Anchors: A Position Paper on the Structural Misalignments of Explainable AI Faithfulness Metrics for Feature Importance24 Sep 2026
- 2025Learning to Attribute with Attention18 Apr 2025
- 2024Analyzing the Attention Heads for Pronoun Disambiguation in Context-aware Machine Translation Models15 Dec 2024
- 2024A Context-aware Framework for Translation-mediated Conversations5 Dec 2024
- 2024Context-Aware or Context-Insensitive? Assessing LLMs' Performance in Document-Level Translation18 Oct 2024
- 2024ContextCite: Attributing Model Generation to Context1 Sep 2024
- 2024A Primer on the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Language Models30 Apr 2024