A Reinforcement Learning Approach in Multi-Phase Second-Price Auction Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study reserve price optimization in multi-phase second price auctions, where the seller's prior actions affect the bidders' later valuations through a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Compared to the bandit setting in existing works, the setting in ours involves three challenges. First, from the seller's perspective, we need to efficiently explore the environment in the presence of potentially untruthful bidders who aim to manipulate the seller's policy. Second, we want to minimize the seller's revenue regret when the market noise distribution is unknown. Third, the seller's per-step revenue is an unknown, nonlinear random variable, and cannot even be directly observed from the environment but realized values. We propose a mechanism addressing all three challenges. To address the first challenge, we use a combination of a new technique named "buffer periods" and inspirations from Reinforcement Learning (RL) with low switching cost to limit bidders' surplus from untruthful bidding, thereby incentivizing approximately truthful bidding. The second one is tackled by a novel algorithm that removes the need for pure exploration when the market noise distribution is unknown. The third challenge is resolved by an extension of LSVI-UCB, where we use the auction's underlying structure to control the uncertainty of the revenue function. The three techniques culminate in the Contextual-LSVI-UCB-Buffer (CLUB) algorithm which achieves tildeO(H5/2√K) revenue regret, where K is the number of episodes and H is the length of each episode, when the market noise is known and tildeO(H3√K) revenue regret when the noise is unknown with no assumptions on bidders' truthfulness.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2022.
Builds on
23 of 55 references.
References · 23
- 2019Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 520
- 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 364
- 2021Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient Algorithmscited by 223
- 2021The Statistical Complexity of Interactive Decision Makingcited by 218
- 2020Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman Errorcited by 181
- 2021Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPscited by 129
- 2021Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation Under Adaptivity Constraintscited by 124
- 2019Optimism in Reinforcement Learning with Generalized Linear Function Approximationcited by 111
- 2018What Doubling Tricks Can and Can't Do for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 71
- 2016Dynamic Pricing in High-dimensionscited by 55
- 2019Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linearly Parameterized Banditscited by 54
- 2021A Provably Efficient Algorithm for Linear Markov Decision Process with Low Switching Costcited by 40
11 more
- 2013Learning Prices for Repeated Auctions with Strategic Buyerscited by 37
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Sponsored Search Real-time Biddingcited by 34
- 2020Dynamic Incentive-aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctionscited by 34
- 2016Dynamic Pricing with Demand Covariatescited by 31
- 2021Policy Optimization Using Semi-parametric Models for Dynamic Pricingcited by 23
- 2019Semi-parametric dynamic contextual pricingcited by 17
- 2019Multi-Product Dynamic Pricing in High-Dimensions with Heterogeneous Price Sensitivitycited by 12
- 2022Strategic Decision-Making in the Presence of Information Asymmetry: Provably Efficient RL with Algorithmic Instrumentscited by 9
- 2022No-Regret Learning in Partially-Informed Auctionscited by 7
- 2019Reserve Pricing in Repeated Second-Price Auctions with Strategic Bidderscited by 3
- 2021Dynamic Pricing and Demand Learning on a Large Network of Products: A PAC-Bayesian Approachcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.