No-Regret Learning in Partially-Informed Auctions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Auctions with partially-revealed information about items are broadly employed in real-world applications, but the underlying mechanisms have limited theoretical support. In this work, we study a machine learning formulation of these types of mechanisms, presenting algorithms that are no-regret from the buyer's perspective. Specifically, a buyer who wishes to maximize his utility interacts repeatedly with a platform over a series of T rounds. In each round, a new item is drawn from an unknown distribution and the platform publishes a price together with incomplete, "masked" information about the item. The buyer then decides whether to purchase the item. We formalize this problem as an online learning task where the goal is to have low regret with respect to a myopic oracle that has perfect knowledge of the distribution over items and the seller's masking function. When the distribution over items is known to the buyer and the mask is a SimHash function mapping ℝd to 0,1ℓ, our algorithm has regret tilde O((Tdℓ)1/2). In a fully agnostic setting when the mask is an arbitrary function mapping to a set of size n and the prices are stochastic, our algorithm has regret tilde O((Tn)1/2).
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2022.
Builds on
3 of 39 references.
References · 3
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
- 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
- 2017Learning to Bid Without Knowing your Valuecited by 34
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Learning to Incentivize Information Acquisition: Proper Scoring Rules Meet Principal-Agent Modelcited by 7
- 2022A Reinforcement Learning Approach in Multi-Phase Second-Price Auction Designcited by 1
- 2025Markets with Heterogeneous Agents: Dynamics and Survival of Bayesian vs. No-Regret Learnerscited by 1
- 2025Learn then Decide: A Learning Approach for Designing Data Marketplacescited by 1
- 2026Profit Maximization in Bilateral Trade against a Smooth Adversarycited by 1
- 2023No Bidding, No Regret: Pairwise-Feedback Mechanisms for Digital Goods and Data Auctionscited by 0
- 2025Provably Efficient Algorithm for Best Scoring Rule Identification in Online Principal-Agent Information Acquisitioncited by 0
- 2026Profit Maximization in Bilateral Trade against a Smooth Adversary12 May 2026
- 2025Provably Efficient Algorithm for Best Scoring Rule Identification in Online Principal-Agent Information Acquisition23 May 2025
- 2025Learn then Decide: A Learning Approach for Designing Data Marketplaces13 Mar 2025
- 2025Markets with Heterogeneous Agents: Dynamics and Survival of Bayesian vs. No-Regret Learners12 Feb 2025
- 2023No Bidding, No Regret: Pairwise-Feedback Mechanisms for Digital Goods and Data Auctions2 Jun 2023
- 2023Learning to Incentivize Information Acquisition: Proper Scoring Rules Meet Principal-Agent Model15 Mar 2023
- 2022A Reinforcement Learning Approach in Multi-Phase Second-Price Auction Design19 Oct 2022