mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Understanding GD with Hard and Conjugate Pseudo-labels for Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2210.10019 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a setting that a model needs to adapt to a new domain under distribution shifts, given that only unlabeled test samples from the new domain are accessible at test time. A common idea in most of the related works is constructing pseudo-labels for the unlabeled test samples and applying gradient descent (GD) to a loss function with the pseudo-labels. Recently, citeGSRK22 propose conjugate labels, which is a new kind of pseudo-labels for self-training at test time. They empirically show that the conjugate label outperforms other ways of pseudo-labeling on many domain adaptation benchmarks. However, provably showing that GD with conjugate labels learns a good classifier for test-time adaptation remains open. In this work, we aim at theoretically understanding GD with hard and conjugate labels for a binary classification problem. We show that for square loss, GD with conjugate labels converges to an ε-optimal predictor under a Gaussian model for any arbitrarily small ε, while GD with hard pseudo-labels fails in this task. We also analyze them under different loss functions for the update. Our results shed lights on understanding when and why GD with hard labels or conjugate labels works in test-time adaptation.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2022.

Builds on

41 of 57 references.

References · 41

  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  5. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  6. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  7. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,079
  8. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  9. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  10. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  11. 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 432
  12. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
29 more
  1. 2019Confidence Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 418
  2. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  3. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  4. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  5. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  6. 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 219
  7. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
  8. 2020Adaptive Risk Minimization: Learning to Adapt to Domain Shiftcited by 183
  9. 2021Neural Collapse Under MSE Loss: Proximity to and Dynamics on the Central Pathcited by 156
  10. 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
  11. 2020Evaluation of Neural Architectures Trained with Square Loss vs Cross-Entropy in Classification Taskscited by 137
  12. 2021Cycle Self-Training for Domain Adaptationcited by 120
  13. 2016A Variational Perspective on Accelerated Methods in Optimizationcited by 108
  14. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  15. 2021Domain Impression: A Source Data Free Domain Adaptation Methodcited by 91
  16. 2019Learning to Self-Train for Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Classificationcited by 83
  17. 2020SENTRY: Selective Entropy Optimization via Committee Consistency for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 78
  18. 2020Self-training Avoids Using Spurious Features Under Domain Shiftcited by 69
  19. 2021Test-Time Adaptation to Distribution Shift by Confidence Maximization and Input Transformationcited by 67
  20. 2021Source-Free Adaptation to Measurement Shift via Bottom-Up Feature Restorationcited by 50
  21. 2020In-N-Out: Pre-Training and Self-Training using Auxiliary Information for Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 49
  22. 2022Revisiting Realistic Test-Time Training: Sequential Inference and Adaptation by Anchored Clusteringcited by 44
  23. 2021If your data distribution shifts, use self-learningcited by 36
  24. 2021Test time Adaptation through Perturbation Robustnesscited by 28
  25. 2020Generative Pseudo-label Refinement for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 24
  26. 2018Acceleration through Optimistic No-Regret Dynamicscited by 22
  27. 2021No-Regret Dynamics in the Fenchel Game: A Unified Framework for Algorithmic Convex Optimizationcited by 20
  28. 2020A Modular Analysis of Provable Acceleration via Polyak's Momentum: Training a Wide ReLU Network and a Deep Linear Networkcited by 18
  29. 2022Provable Acceleration of Heavy Ball beyond Quadratics for a Class of Polyak-Lojasiewicz Functions when the Non-Convexity is Averaged-Outcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

9 papers.