Post-hoc analysis of Arabic transformer models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Arabic is a Semitic language which is widely spoken with many dialects. Given the success of pre-trained language models, many transformer models trained on Arabic and its dialects have surfaced. While there have been an extrinsic evaluation of these models with respect to downstream NLP tasks, no work has been carried out to analyze and compare their internal representations. We probe how linguistic information is encoded in the transformer models, trained on different Arabic dialects. We perform a layer and neuron analysis on the models using morphological tagging tasks for different dialects of Arabic and a dialectal identification task. Our analysis enlightens interesting findings such as: i) word morphology is learned at the lower and middle layers, ii) while syntactic dependencies are predominantly captured at the higher layers, iii) despite a large overlap in their vocabulary, the MSA-based models fail to capture the nuances of Arabic dialects, iv) we found that neurons in embedding layers are polysemous in nature, while the neurons in middle layers are exclusive to specific properties
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2022.
Builds on
32 of 59 references.
References · 32
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
- 2020AraBERT: Transformer-based Model for Arabic Language Understandingcited by 359
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
- 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 210
- 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
20 more
- 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
- 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 165
- 2020ARBERT & MARBERT: Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Arabiccited by 164
- 2018What Is One Grain of Sand in the Desert? Analyzing Individual Neurons in Deep NLP Modelscited by 124
- 2021The Interplay of Variant, Size, and Task Type in Arabic Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 118
- 2018Identifying and Controlling Important Neurons in Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2020Analyzing Individual Neurons in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 97
- 2020KUISAIL at SemEval-2020 Task 12: BERT-CNN for Offensive Speech Identification in Social Mediacited by 84
- 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
- 2022Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERTcited by 56
- 2020AraELECTRA: Pre-Training Text Discriminators for Arabic Language Understandingcited by 43
- 2021Pre-Training BERT on Arabic Tweets: Practical Considerationscited by 39
- 20161.5 billion words Arabic Corpuscited by 35
- 2019On the Linguistic Representational Power of Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 34
- 2019Overview for the Second Shared Task on Language Identification in Code-Switched Datacited by 33
- 2021How transfer learning impacts linguistic knowledge in deep NLP models?cited by 32
- 2018NeuroX: A Toolkit for Analyzing Individual Neurons in Neural Networkscited by 31
- 2020Finding Experts in Transformer Modelscited by 28
- 2022Discovering Salient Neurons in Deep NLP Modelscited by 21
- 2021Effect of Post-processing on Contextualized Word Representationscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.