Effect of Post-processing on Contextualized Word Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-processing of static embedding has beenshown to improve their performance on both lexical and sequence-level tasks. However, post-processing for contextualized embeddings is an under-studied problem. In this work, we question the usefulness of post-processing for contextualized embeddings obtained from different layers of pre-trained language models. More specifically, we standardize individual neuron activations using z-score, min-max normalization, and by removing top principle components using the all-but-the-top method. Additionally, we apply unit length normalization to word representations. On a diverse set of pre-trained models, we show that post-processing unwraps vital information present in the representations for both lexical tasks (such as word similarity and analogy)and sequence classification tasks. Our findings raise interesting points in relation to theresearch studies that use contextualized representations, and suggest z-score normalization as an essential step to consider when using them in an application.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2021.
Builds on
31 of 63 references.
References · 31
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
19 more
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
- 2019Revealing the Dark Secrets of BERTcited by 300
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
- 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 165
- 2018What Is One Grain of Sand in the Desert? Analyzing Individual Neurons in Deep NLP Modelscited by 124
- 2018Identifying and Controlling Important Neurons in Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2020Analyzing Individual Neurons in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 97
- 2018Evaluating Layers of Representation in Neural Machine Translation on Part-of-Speech and Semantic Tagging Taskscited by 56
- 2020Similarity Analysis of Contextual Word Representation Modelscited by 54
- 2020jiant: A Software Toolkit for Research on General-Purpose Text Understanding Modelscited by 39
- 2019On the Linguistic Representational Power of Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 34
- 2015Controlled Experiments for Word Embeddingscited by 5
- 2018Post-Processing of Word Representations via Variance Normalization and Dynamic Embeddingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
7 papers.
- 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
- 2023Stable Anisotropic Regularizationcited by 12
- 2023Evaluating Neuron Interpretation Methods of NLP Modelscited by 8
- 2022Reconstruction Probingcited by 2
- 2022Post-hoc analysis of Arabic transformer modelscited by 1
- 2024Norm of Mean Contextualized Embeddings Determines their Variancecited by 1
- 2022Interpreting Arabic Transformer Modelscited by 0
- 2024Norm of Mean Contextualized Embeddings Determines their Variance17 Sep 2024
- 2023Stable Anisotropic Regularization30 May 2023
- 2023Evaluating Neuron Interpretation Methods of NLP Models30 Jan 2023
- 2022Reconstruction Probing21 Dec 2022
- 2022Post-hoc analysis of Arabic transformer models18 Oct 2022
- 2022Interpreting Arabic Transformer Models19 Jan 2022
- 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Survey30 Aug 2021