mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-granularity Argument Mining in Legal Texts

arXiv 2210.09472 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2022cs.CL cs.IRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we explore legal argument mining using multiple levels of granularity. Argument mining has usually been conceptualized as a sentence classification problem. In this work, we conceptualize argument mining as a token-level (i.e., word-level) classification problem. We use a Longformer model to classify the tokens. Results show that token-level text classification identifies certain legal argument elements more accurately than sentence-level text classification. Token-level classification also provides greater flexibility to analyze legal texts and to gain more insight into what the model focuses on when processing a large amount of input data.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.

Builds on

7 of 32 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  2. 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 544
  3. 2021When Does Pretraining Help? Assessing Self-Supervised Learning for Law and the CaseHOLD Datasetcited by 199
  4. 2016Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essayscited by 99
  5. 2019Portuguese Named Entity Recognition using BERT-CRFcited by 73
  6. 2019Fine-Grained Argument Unit Recognition and Classificationcited by 26
  7. 2022ArgLegalSumm: Improving Abstractive Summarization of Legal Documents with Argument Miningcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.