mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tunable Complexity Benchmarks for Evaluating Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations

arXiv 2210.07880 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022stat.ML cs.LG cs.NAcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we assess the ability of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve increasingly-complex coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We focus on a pair of benchmarks: discretized partial differential equations and harmonic oscillators, each of which has a tunable parameter that controls its complexity. Even by varying network architecture and applying a state-of-the-art training method that accounts for "difficult" training regions, we show that PINNs eventually fail to produce correct solutions to these benchmarks as their complexity -- the number of equations and the size of time domain -- increases. We identify several reasons why this may be the case, including insufficient network capacity, poor conditioning of the ODEs, and high local curvature, as measured by the Laplacian of the PINN loss.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  5. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  6. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  7. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
  8. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 368
  9. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
  10. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
  11. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 291
  12. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
9 more
  1. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 231
  2. 2020ADAHESSIAN: An Adaptive Second Order Optimizer for Machine Learningcited by 201
  3. 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 160
  4. 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 154
  5. 2018Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 133
  6. 2019PPINN: Parareal Physics-Informed Neural Network for time-dependent PDEscited by 116
  7. 2021Long-time integration of parametric evolution equations with physics-informed DeepONetscited by 87
  8. 2021Inverse-Dirichlet Weighting Enables Reliable Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 43
  9. 2020Active Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Aggregate and Interpolate Parametric Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equationscited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

4 papers.