mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Aggregate and Interpolate Parametric Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations

arXiv 2005.05092 ↗First posted 2 May 2020physics.comp-ph cs.CE cs.LGcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The goal of this work is to train a neural network which approximates solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations across a region of parameter space, in which the parameters define physical properties such as domain shape and boundary conditions. The contributions of this work are threefold: 1) To demonstrate that neural networks can be efficient aggregators of whole families of parameteric solutions to physical problems, trained using data created with traditional, trusted numerical methods such as finite elements. Advantages include extremely fast evaluation of pressure and velocity at any point in physical and parameter space (asymptotically, ~3 μ s / query), and data compression (the network requires 99% less storage space compared to its own training data). 2) To demonstrate that the neural networks can accurately interpolate between finite element solutions in parameter space, allowing them to be instantly queried for pressure and velocity field solutions to problems for which traditional simulations have never been performed. 3) To introduce an active learning algorithm, so that during training, a finite element solver can automatically be queried to obtain additional training data in locations where the neural network's predictions are in most need of improvement, thus autonomously acquiring and efficiently distributing training data throughout parameter space. In addition to the obvious utility of Item 2, above, we demonstrate an application of the network in rapid parameter sweeping, very precisely predicting the degree of narrowing in a tube which would result in a 50% increase in end-to-end pressure difference at a given flow rate. This capability could have applications in both medical diagnosis of arterial disease, and in computer-aided design.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  2. 2021HyperPINN: Learning parameterized differential equations with physics-informed hypernetworkscited by 38
  3. 2024Active Learning for Neural PDE Solverscited by 22
  4. 2023Physics-aware Machine Learning Revolutionizes Scientific Paradigm for Machine Learning and Process-based Hydrologycited by 11
  5. 2022Tunable Complexity Benchmarks for Evaluating Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Coupled Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 4
  6. 2025Active Learning with Selective Time-Step Acquisition for PDEscited by 4
  7. 2022An AI-based Domain-Decomposition Non-Intrusive Reduced-Order Model for Extended Domains applied to Multiphase Flow in Pipescited by 3
  8. 2023Temporal Consistency Loss for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 3
  9. 2021Physics-Coupled Spatio-Temporal Active Learning for Dynamical Systemscited by 2
  10. 2022Investigation of Physics-Informed Deep Learning for the Prediction of Parametric, Three-Dimensional Flow Based on Boundary Datacited by 2
  11. 2023Physics-Informed Machine Learning of Argon Gas-Driven Melt Pool Dynamicscited by 2
  12. 2023Investigating the Ability of PINNs To Solve Burgers' PDE Near Finite-Time BlowUpcited by 2
12 more
  1. 2025Active Learning for Deep Learning-Based Hemodynamic Parameter Estimationcited by 2
  2. 2025Noisy PDE Training Requires Bigger PINNscited by 2
  3. 2022Design of Turing Systems with Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 0
  4. 2023Investigation of Compressor Cascade Flow Using Physics- Informed Neural Networks with Adaptive Learning Strategycited by 0
  5. 2023Ensemble models outperform single model uncertainties and predictions for operator-learning of hypersonic flowscited by 0
  6. 2024Improving PINNs By Algebraic Inclusion of Boundary and Initial Conditionscited by 0
  7. 2024An efficient hp-Variational PINNs framework for incompressible Navier-Stokes equationscited by 0
  8. 2025Learning Null Geodesics for Gravitational Lensing Rendering in General Relativitycited by 0
  9. 2025Intelligent Optimization of Multi-Parameter Micromixers Using a Scientific Machine Learning Frameworkcited by 0
  10. 2026Surrogate models for Rock-Fluid Interaction: A Grid-Size-Invariant Approachcited by 0
  11. 2026A Numerical Method for Coupling Parameterized Physics-Informed Neural Networks and FDM for Advanced Thermal-Hydraulic System Simulationcited by 0
  12. 2026Loss-Conditional PINNs for Parametric PDE Familiescited by 0