mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bayes risk CTC: Controllable CTC alignment in Sequence-to-Sequence tasks

arXiv 2210.07499 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2022cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequence-to-Sequence (seq2seq) tasks transcribe the input sequence to a target sequence. The Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) criterion is widely used in multiple seq2seq tasks. Besides predicting the target sequence, a side product of CTC is to predict the alignment, which is the most probable input-long sequence that specifies a hard aligning relationship between the input and target units. As there are multiple potential aligning sequences (called paths) that are equally considered in CTC formulation, the choice of which path will be most probable and become the predicted alignment is always uncertain. In addition, it is usually observed that the alignment predicted by vanilla CTC will drift compared with its reference and rarely provides practical functionalities. Thus, the motivation of this work is to make the CTC alignment prediction controllable and thus equip CTC with extra functionalities. The Bayes risk CTC (BRCTC) criterion is then proposed in this work, in which a customizable Bayes risk function is adopted to enforce the desired characteristics of the predicted alignment. With the risk function, the BRCTC is a general framework to adopt some customizable preference over the paths in order to concentrate the posterior into a particular subset of the paths. In applications, we explore one particular preference which yields models with the down-sampling ability and reduced inference costs. By using BRCTC with another preference for early emissions, we obtain an improved performance-latency trade-off for online models. Experimentally, the proposed BRCTC reduces the inference cost of offline models by up to 47% without performance degradation and cuts down the overall latency of online systems to an unseen level.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2022.

Builds on

40 of 62 references.

References · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,863
  4. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  5. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,380
  6. 2015Listen, Attend and Spellcited by 543
  7. 2017AISHELL-1: An Open-Source Mandarin Speech Corpus and A Speech Recognition Baselinecited by 373
  8. 2020Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 256
  9. 2021WenetSpeech: A 10000+ Hours Multi-domain Mandarin Corpus for Speech Recognitioncited by 197
  10. 2018AISHELL-2: Transforming Mandarin ASR Research Into Industrial Scalecited by 128
  11. 2021WeNet: Production oriented Streaming and Non-streaming End-to-End Speech Recognition Toolkitcited by 125
  12. 2020Emformer: Efficient Memory Transformer Based Acoustic Model For Low Latency Streaming Speech Recognitioncited by 113
28 more
  1. 2020Glancing Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 103
  2. 2020Fully Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: Tricks of the Tradecited by 99
  3. 2020Developing Real-time Streaming Transformer Transducer for Speech Recognition on Large-scale Datasetcited by 97
  4. 2021Intermediate Loss Regularization for CTC-based Speech Recognitioncited by 96
  5. 2016LipNet: End-to-End Sentence-level Lipreadingcited by 80
  6. 2020Mask CTC: Non-Autoregressive End-to-End ASR with CTC and Mask Predictcited by 76
  7. 2020CTC-Segmentation of Large Corpora for German End-to-end Speech Recognitioncited by 76
  8. 2020FastEmit: Low-latency Streaming ASR with Sequence-level Emission Regularizationcited by 69
  9. 2018End-to-End Automatic Speech Translation of Audiobookscited by 65
  10. 2018TACO: Learning Task Decomposition via Temporal Alignment for Controlcited by 62
  11. 2020Bridging the Modality Gap for Speech-to-Text Translationcited by 55
  12. 2022Pruned RNN-T for fast, memory-efficient ASR trainingcited by 46
  13. 2021CTC-based Compression for Direct Speech Translationcited by 45
  14. 2020Alignment Restricted Streaming Recurrent Neural Network Transducercited by 42
  15. 2021Non-Autoregressive Translation with Layer-Wise Prediction and Deep Supervisioncited by 40
  16. 2020A New Training Pipeline for an Improved Neural Transducercited by 34
  17. 2021Why does CTC result in peaky behavior?cited by 33
  18. 2022CTC Alignments Improve Autoregressive Translationcited by 25
  19. 2021Investigating the Reordering Capability in CTC-based Non-Autoregressive End-to-End Speech Translationcited by 23
  20. 2020Differentiable Weighted Finite-State Transducerscited by 22
  21. 2020Semi-Supervised Speech Recognition via Graph-based Temporal Classificationcited by 19
  22. 2019Guiding CTC Posterior Spike Timings for Improved Posterior Fusion and Knowledge Distillationcited by 18
  23. 2021CTC Variations Through New WFST Topologiescited by 17
  24. 2021Reducing Streaming ASR Model Delay with Self Alignmentcited by 16
  25. 2022Star Temporal Classification: Sequence Classification with Partially Labeled Datacited by 10
  26. 2022LegoNN: Building Modular Encoder-Decoder Modelscited by 9
  27. 2020Towards Real-time Mispronunciation Detection in Kids' Speechcited by 8
  28. 2018Advancing Multi-Accented LSTM-CTC Speech Recognition using a Domain Specific Student-Teacher Learning Paradigmcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: