mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Annotating Norwegian Language Varieties on Twitter for Part-of-Speech

arXiv 2210.06150 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2022cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Norwegian Twitter data poses an interesting challenge for Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. These texts are difficult for models trained on standardized text in one of the two Norwegian written forms (Bokmaal and Nynorsk), as they contain both the typical variation of social media text, as well as a large amount of dialectal variety. In this paper we present a novel Norwegian Twitter dataset annotated with POS-tags. We show that models trained on Universal Dependency (UD) data perform worse when evaluated against this dataset, and that models trained on Bokmaal generally perform better than those trained on Nynorsk. We also see that performance on dialectal tweets is comparable to the written standards for some models. Finally we perform a detailed analysis of the errors that models commonly make on this data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2022.

Builds on

5 of 28 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  2. 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
  3. 2021Operationalizing a National Digital Library: The Case for a Norwegian Transformer Modelcited by 23
  4. 2021NorDial: A Preliminary Corpus of Written Norwegian Dialect Usecited by 5
  5. 2017To Normalize, or Not to Normalize: The Impact of Normalization on Part-of-Speech Taggingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.