mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

To Normalize, or Not to Normalize: The Impact of Normalization on Part-of-Speech Tagging

arXiv 1707.05116 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2017cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Does normalization help Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging accuracy on noisy, non-canonical data? To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the actual impact of normalization in a real-world scenario, where gold error detection is not available. We investigate the effect of automatic normalization on POS tagging of tweets. We also compare normalization to strategies that leverage large amounts of unlabeled data kept in its raw form. Our results show that normalization helps, but does not add consistently beyond just word embedding layer initialization. The latter approach yields a tagging model that is competitive with a Twitter state-of-the-art tagger.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.