mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Label-free segmentation from cardiac ultrasound using self-supervised learning

arXiv 2210.04979 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Segmentation and measurement of cardiac chambers is critical in cardiac ultrasound but is laborious and poorly reproducible. Neural networks can assist, but supervised approaches require the same laborious manual annotations. We built a pipeline for self-supervised (no manual labels) segmentation combining computer vision, clinical domain knowledge, and deep learning. We trained on 450 echocardiograms (93,000 images) and tested on 8,393 echocardiograms (4,476,266 images; mean 61 years, 51% female), using the resulting segmentations to calculate biometrics. We also tested against external images from an additional 10,030 patients with available manual tracings of the left ventricle. r2 between clinically measured and pipeline-predicted measurements were similar to reported inter-clinician variation and comparable to supervised learning across several different measurements (r2 0.56-0.84). Average accuracy for detecting abnormal chamber size and function was 0.85 (range 0.71-0.97) compared to clinical measurements. A subset of test echocardiograms (n=553) had corresponding cardiac MRIs, where MRI is the gold standard. Correlation between pipeline and MRI measurements was similar to that between clinical echocardiogram and MRI. Finally, the pipeline accurately segments the left ventricle with an average Dice score of 0.89 (95% CI [0.89]) in the external, manually labeled dataset. Our results demonstrate a manual-label free, clinically valid, and highly scalable method for segmentation from ultrasound, a noisy but globally important imaging modality.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2022.

Builds on

15 of 75 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  3. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  4. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
  5. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 657
  6. 2015Holistically-Nested Edge Detectioncited by 592
  7. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  8. 2019Deep Learning for Segmentation using an Open Large-Scale Dataset in 2D Echocardiographycited by 244
  9. 2020U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: theory and applicationscited by 169
  10. 2021Adaptive Early-Learning Correction for Segmentation from Noisy Annotationscited by 62
  11. 2019Understanding Deep Learning Techniques for Image Segmentationcited by 38
  12. 2022Contrastive Pretraining for Echocardiography Segmentation with Limited Datacited by 13
3 more
  1. 2020Robustness study of noisy annotation in deep learning based medical image segmentationcited by 9
  2. 2018Self-Learning to Detect and Segment Cysts in Lung CT Images without Manual Annotationcited by 6
  3. 2018Deep-learning models improve on community-level diagnosis for common congenital heart disease lesionscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

8 papers.