Robustness study of noisy annotation in deep learning based medical image segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Partly due to the use of exhaustive-annotated data, deep networks have achieved impressive performance on medical image segmentation. Medical imaging data paired with noisy annotation are, however, ubiquitous, but little is known about the effect of noisy annotation on deep learning-based medical image segmentation. We studied the effects of noisy annotation in the context of mandible segmentation from CT images. First, 202 images of Head and Neck cancer patients were collected from our clinical database, where the organs-at-risk were annotated by one of 12 planning dosimetrists. The mandibles were roughly annotated as the planning avoiding structure. Then, mandible labels were checked and corrected by a physician to get clean annotations. At last, by varying the ratios of noisy labels in the training data, deep learning-based segmentation models were trained, one for each ratio. In general, a deep network trained with noisy labels had worse segmentation results than that trained with clean labels, and fewer noisy labels led to better segmentation. When using 20% or less noisy cases for training, no significant difference was found on the prediction performance between the models trained by noisy or clean. This study suggests that deep learning-based medical image segmentation is robust to noisy annotations to some extent. It also highlights the importance of labeling quality in deep learning
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021SinGAN-Seg: Synthetic training data generation for medical image segmentationcited by 43
- 2022Label-free segmentation from cardiac ultrasound using self-supervised learningcited by 8
- 2022On Image Segmentation With Noisy Labels: Characterization and Volume Properties of the Optimal Solutions to Accuracy and Dicecited by 6
- 2021Can non-specialists provide high quality gold standard labels in challenging modalities?cited by 3
- 2022Deep Multi-Scale U-Net Architecture and Label-Noise Robust Training Strategies for Histopathological Image Segmentationcited by 2
- 2025From Noisy Labels to Intrinsic Structure: A Geometric-Structural Dual-Guided Framework for Noise-Robust Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1
- 2023Marginal Thresholding in Noisy Image Segmentationcited by 0
- 2025Good Enough? An Investigation on the Impact of Label Quality in Large-Scale Medical Datasetscited by 0
- 2026Evaluating ADC-only deep learning pipelines for breast cancer detection and segmentation using standalone diffusion-weighted MRIcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating ADC-only deep learning pipelines for breast cancer detection and segmentation using standalone diffusion-weighted MRI18 Aug 2026
- 2025From Noisy Labels to Intrinsic Structure: A Geometric-Structural Dual-Guided Framework for Noise-Robust Medical Image Segmentation2 Sep 2025
- 2025Good Enough? An Investigation on the Impact of Label Quality in Large-Scale Medical Datasets27 May 2025
- 2023Marginal Thresholding in Noisy Image Segmentation8 Apr 2023
- 2022Label-free segmentation from cardiac ultrasound using self-supervised learning10 Oct 2022
- 2022On Image Segmentation With Noisy Labels: Characterization and Volume Properties of the Optimal Solutions to Accuracy and Dice13 Jun 2022
- 2022Deep Multi-Scale U-Net Architecture and Label-Noise Robust Training Strategies for Histopathological Image Segmentation3 May 2022
- 2021Can non-specialists provide high quality gold standard labels in challenging modalities?30 Jul 2021
- 2021SinGAN-Seg: Synthetic training data generation for medical image segmentation29 Jun 2021