Evaluating self-supervised echocardiographic representations across downstream extraction strategies for left-ventricular segmentation and ejection fraction estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is increasingly used in medical imaging to reduce annotation requirements, but representation quality is often judged using a single downstream evaluation setting. For dense clinical tasks, this can confound representation quality with the capacity of the downstream model used to recover task-relevant information. We present a systematic evaluation of self-supervised representations for left-ventricular segmentation and ejection fraction (EF) estimation from apical four-chamber echocardiography on EchoNet-Dynamic. Rather than relying on a single downstream probe, we compare a hierarchy of extraction strategies with increasing expressivity: heuristic extraction without mask-supervised training, frozen linear probes, frozen lightweight decoder probes, and partial fine-tuning. We apply this framework to two complementary representation families: generic frozen self-DIstillation with NO labels (DINOv3) features and a task-adapted dense self-supervised representation, Bootstrap Your Own Segmentation (BYOS). In both families, heuristic extraction substantially understated what was recoverable from the frozen representation. For DINOv3, performance improved from Dice 0.684 and EF mean absolute error (MAE) 13.01 under heuristic extraction to Dice 0.906 and EF MAE 9.65 with a frozen lightweight decoder, approaching a supervised U-Net baseline (Dice 0.915, EF MAE 9.72). For BYOS, performance improved from Dice 0.687 and EF MAE 17.83 under heuristic extraction to Dice 0.902 and EF MAE 8.74 with a frozen lightweight decoder. These results show that conclusions about self-supervised representation quality in dense echocardiographic analysis depend strongly on the downstream extraction strategy used for evaluation. We therefore argue that multi-strategy evaluation is an important methodological consideration for SSL in dense medical image analysis.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 14 references.
References · 10
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
- 2023What Do Self-Supervised Vision Transformers Learn?cited by 93
- 2026From Entropy to Epiplexity: Rethinking Information for Computationally Bounded Intelligencecited by 41
- 2020Models Genesiscited by 26
- 2022Label-free segmentation from cardiac ultrasound using self-supervised learningcited by 8
- 2024Dense Self-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Cyclical Self-Supervision for Semi-Supervised Ejection Fraction Prediction from Echocardiogram Videos
- 2024EchoDFKD: Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Cardiac Ultrasound Segmentation using Synthetic Data
- 2025Hierarchical Spatio-temporal Segmentation Network for Ejection Fraction Estimation in Echocardiography Videos
- 2026Generative Regression for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Estimation from Echocardiography Video
- 2025ControlEchoSynth: Boosting Ejection Fraction Estimation Models via Controlled Video Diffusion
- 2025CardiacCLIP: Video-based CLIP Adaptation for LVEF Prediction in a Few-shot Manner
- 2026EchoDiST: Self-distillation-based joint learning for diffusion-conditioned echocardiographic myocardial motion estimation
- 2026CoralBay: A Self-Supervised CT Foundation Model