mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Residual-based error correction for neural operator accelerated infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems

arXiv 2210.03008 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2022math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We explore using neural operators, or neural network representations of nonlinear maps between function spaces, to accelerate infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems (BIPs) with models governed by nonlinear parametric partial differential equations (PDEs). Neural operators have gained significant attention in recent years for their ability to approximate the parameter-to-solution maps defined by PDEs using as training data solutions of PDEs at a limited number of parameter samples. The computational cost of BIPs can be drastically reduced if the large number of PDE solves required for posterior characterization are replaced with evaluations of trained neural operators. However, reducing error in the resulting BIP solutions via reducing the approximation error of the neural operators in training can be challenging and unreliable. We provide an a priori error bound result that implies certain BIPs can be ill-conditioned to the approximation error of neural operators, thus leading to inaccessible accuracy requirements in training. To reliably deploy neural operators in BIPs, we consider a strategy for enhancing the performance of neural operators, which is to correct the prediction of a trained neural operator by solving a linear variational problem based on the PDE residual. We show that a trained neural operator with error correction can achieve a quadratic reduction of its approximation error, all while retaining substantial computational speedups of posterior sampling when models are governed by highly nonlinear PDEs. The strategy is applied to two numerical examples of BIPs based on a nonlinear reaction--diffusion problem and deformation of hyperelastic materials. We demonstrate that posterior representations of the two BIPs produced using trained neural operators are greatly and consistently enhanced by error correction.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.

Builds on

34 of 120 references.

References · 34

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 537
  4. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 516
  5. 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 413
  6. 2020Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 343
  7. 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 318
  8. 2020Model Reduction and Neural Networks for Parametric PDEscited by 257
  9. 2020A Comprehensive Survey of Neural Architecture Search: Challenges and Solutionscited by 253
  10. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 220
  11. 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 141
  12. 2021POD-DL-ROM: enhancing deep learning-based reduced order models for nonlinear parametrized PDEs by proper orthogonal decompositioncited by 79
22 more
  1. 2018ResNet with one-neuron hidden layers is a Universal Approximatorcited by 78
  2. 2019Deep Learning via Dynamical Systems: An Approximation Perspectivecited by 78
  3. 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
  4. 2022Derivative-Informed Neural Operator: An Efficient Framework for High-Dimensional Parametric Derivative Learningcited by 43
  5. 2020Derivative-Informed Projected Neural Networks for High-Dimensional Parametric Maps Governed by PDEscited by 40
  6. 2014Dimension-independent likelihood-informed MCMCcited by 36
  7. 2013A computational framework for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems. Part I: The linearized case, with application to global seismic inversioncited by 32
  8. 2021Projected Wasserstein gradient descent for high-dimensional Bayesian inferencecited by 24
  9. 2021Fast PDE-constrained optimization via self-supervised operator learningcited by 24
  10. 2019Projected Stein Variational Newton: A Fast and Scalable Bayesian Inference Method in High Dimensionscited by 21
  11. 2014Data-Driven Model Reduction for the Bayesian Solution of Inverse Problemscited by 20
  12. 2013A computational framework for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems: Part II. Stochastic Newton MCMC with application to ice sheet flow inverse problemscited by 19
  13. 2019Parallel Gaussian process surrogate Bayesian inference with noisy likelihood evaluationscited by 18
  14. 2022Large-scale Bayesian optimal experimental design with derivative-informed projected neural networkcited by 17
  15. 2021Learning High-Dimensional Parametric Maps via Reduced Basis Adaptive Residual Networkscited by 16
  16. 2014Scalable and efficient algorithms for the propagation of uncertainty from data through inference to prediction for large-scale problems, with application to flow of the Antarctic ice sheetcited by 13
  17. 2022Bayesian Inference of Tissue Heterogeneity for Individualized Prediction of Glioma Growthcited by 6
  18. 2020Bayesian Poroelastic Aquifer Characterization from InSAR Surface Deformation Data. Part I: Maximum A Posteriori Estimatecited by 5
  19. 2019Inexact Newton Methods for Stochastic Nonconvex Optimization with Applications to Neural Network Trainingcited by 4
  20. 2020Low Rank Saddle Free Newton: A Scalable Method for Stochastic Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 4
  21. 2022Goal-Oriented A-Posteriori Estimation of Model Error as an Aid to Parameter Estimationcited by 4
  22. 2020Bayesian inference of heterogeneous epidemic models: Application to COVID-19 spread accounting for long-term care facilitiescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Derivative-enhanced Deep Operator Networkcited by 19
  2. 2023Efficient PDE-Constrained optimization under high-dimensional uncertainty using derivative-informed neural operatorscited by 18
  3. 2023D2NO: Efficient Handling of Heterogeneous Input Function Spaces with Distributed Deep Neural Operatorscited by 18
  4. 2023Neural Dynamical Operator: Continuous Spatial-Temporal Model with Gradient-Based and Derivative-Free Optimization Methodscited by 14
  5. 2023Adaptive operator learning for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problemscited by 11
  6. 2024Spectral-Refiner: Accurate Fine-Tuning of Spatiotemporal Fourier Neural Operator for Turbulent Flowscited by 10
  7. 2023Residual-Based Error Corrector Operator to Enhance Accuracy and Reliability of Neural Operator Surrogates of Nonlinear Variational Boundary-Value Problemscited by 9
  8. 2025PhysicsCorrect: A Training-Free Approach for Stable Neural PDE Simulationscited by 8
  9. 2023InVAErt networks: a data-driven framework for model synthesis and identifiability analysiscited by 6
  10. 2025Neural-Initialized Newton: Accelerating Nonlinear Finite Elements via Operator Learningcited by 6
  11. 2026Performance of Neural and Polynomial Operator Surrogatescited by 5
  12. 2024Neural Operator induced Gaussian Process framework for probabilistic solution of parametric partial differential equationscited by 4
9 more
  1. 2024Learning Latent Space Dynamics with Model-Form Uncertainties: A Stochastic Reduced-Order Modeling Approachcited by 2
  2. 2025Bayesian BiLO: Bilevel Local Operator Learning for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification of Bayesian PDE Inverse Problems with Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 2
  3. 2025Numerical PDE solvers outperform neural PDE solverscited by 2
  4. 2026Error-Conditioned Neural Solverscited by 1
  5. 2025Residual Correction Models for AC Optimal Power Flow Using DC Optimal Power Flow Solutionscited by 0
  6. 2026Deep Adaptive Dimension Reduction for Bayesian Inference in Inverse Problemscited by 0
  7. 2026Structured Extrema Errors in Classical Surrogates for Viscous Burgers: A Physics-Consistent Interpretationcited by 0
  8. 2026Cost-Accuracy Trade-offs: Neural Operator vs Classical Numerical Solvercited by 0
  9. 2026Adapting neural operators for mechanics decisions under changing operating conditionscited by 0