Structured Extrema Errors in Classical Surrogates for Viscous Burgers: A Physics-Consistent Interpretation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the local errors of classical machine-learning surrogate models, which approximate the time evolution of the one-dimensional viscous Burgers equation. Four models are compared on the same prediction task, using the spatial grid values directly: radial basis function (RBF) kernel ridge regression (KRR), linear Ridge, ExtraTrees, and Random Forests. Across all four models, the one-step residual, defined here as the true value minus the predicted value at each grid point, forms clear curved branches near predicted maxima and minima. A more detailed analysis of KRR shows that these errors are much more strongly related to the second spatial derivative, which measures local curvature, than to the first spatial derivative. Near a smooth extremum, predicted value and curvature form a local two-branch fold. Under our local curvature-based model of the residual, this fold predicts a leading-order near-parabolic relation between predicted value and residual. This geometric result motivates a direct test of the Burgers advection (transport) and diffusion (smoothing) terms. For KRR and Ridge, regression tests on held-out trajectories, a control that breaks the spatial alignment of the diffusion term, and a spectral test of high-frequency content are consistent with insufficient viscous smoothing at moderate and high viscosity. In this case, the surrogate retains more small-scale structure than the true future state. The same physical explanation is much weaker for the tree models. Finally, a correction that uses only predicted quantities reduces both one-step error and error during recursive rollout, where each prediction is used as the next input.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
9 of 27 references.
References · 9
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 413
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 166
- 2022Residual-based error correction for neural operator accelerated infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problemscited by 21
- 2024Operator Learning Using Random Features: A Tool for Scientific Computingcited by 21
- 2023Residual-Based Error Corrector Operator to Enhance Accuracy and Reliability of Neural Operator Surrogates of Nonlinear Variational Boundary-Value Problemscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.