Federated Boosted Decision Trees with Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is great demand for scalable, secure, and efficient privacy-preserving machine learning models that can be trained over distributed data. While deep learning models typically achieve the best results in a centralized non-secure setting, different models can excel when privacy and communication constraints are imposed. Instead, tree-based approaches such as XGBoost have attracted much attention for their high performance and ease of use; in particular, they often achieve state-of-the-art results on tabular data. Consequently, several recent works have focused on translating Gradient Boosted Decision Tree (GBDT) models like XGBoost into federated settings, via cryptographic mechanisms such as Homomorphic Encryption (HE) and Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC). However, these do not always provide formal privacy guarantees, or consider the full range of hyperparameters and implementation settings. In this work, we implement the GBDT model under Differential Privacy (DP). We propose a general framework that captures and extends existing approaches for differentially private decision trees. Our framework of methods is tailored to the federated setting, and we show that with a careful choice of techniques it is possible to achieve very high utility while maintaining strong levels of privacy.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.
Builds on
32 of 66 references.
References · 32
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
- 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
20 more
- 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 180
- 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 176
- 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 170
- 2020The Discrete Gaussian for Differential Privacycited by 135
- 2022Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacycited by 87
- 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 68
- 2021Do We Really Need Deep Learning Models for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 45
- 2022Defending against Reconstruction Attacks with R'enyi Differential Privacycited by 32
- 2020FederBoost: Private Federated Learning for GBDTcited by 27
- 2020Large-Scale Secure XGB for Vertical Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2021Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable Boostingcited by 24
- 2019Privacy-Preserving Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 20
- 2019SecureGBM: Secure Multi-Party Gradient Boostingcited by 19
- 2016Differentially Private Random Decision Forests using Smooth Sensitivitycited by 16
- 2020Secure Collaborative Training and Inference for XGBoostcited by 9
- 2021FedXGBoost: Privacy-Preserving XGBoost for Federated Learningcited by 9
- 2020Privacy-Preserving XGBoost Inferencecited by 5
- 2021DP-XGBoost: Private Machine Learning at Scalecited by 3
- 2022Private Boosted Decision Trees via Smooth Re-Weightingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measurescited by 16
- 2024Cross-silo Federated Learning with Record-level Personalized Differential Privacycited by 9
- 2023Effective and Efficient Federated Tree Learning on Hybrid Datacited by 5
- 2023Deep incremental learning models for financial temporal tabular datasets with distribution shiftscited by 1
- 2023DPM: Clustering Sensitive Data through Separationcited by 1
- 2023S-BDT: Distributed Differentially Private Boosted Decision Treescited by 0
- 2024Privacy-preserving federated prediction of pain intensity change based on multi-center survey datacited by 0
- 2025TimberStrike: Dataset Reconstruction Attack Revealing Privacy Leakage in Federated Tree-Based Systemscited by 0
- 2026Towards Explainable Federated Learning: Understanding the Impact of Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2026Towards Explainable Federated Learning: Understanding the Impact of Differential Privacy10 Feb 2026
- 2025TimberStrike: Dataset Reconstruction Attack Revealing Privacy Leakage in Federated Tree-Based Systems9 Jun 2025
- 2024Privacy-preserving federated prediction of pain intensity change based on multi-center survey data12 Sep 2024
- 2024Cross-silo Federated Learning with Record-level Personalized Differential Privacy29 Jan 2024
- 2023Effective and Efficient Federated Tree Learning on Hybrid Data18 Oct 2023
- 2023S-BDT: Distributed Differentially Private Boosted Decision Trees21 Sep 2023
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measures23 Aug 2023
- 2023DPM: Clustering Sensitive Data through Separation6 Jul 2023
- 2023Deep incremental learning models for financial temporal tabular datasets with distribution shifts14 Mar 2023