mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SecureGBM: Secure Multi-Party Gradient Boosting

arXiv 1911.11997 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated machine learning systems have been widely used to facilitate the joint data analytics across the distributed datasets owned by the different parties that do not trust each others. In this paper, we proposed a novel Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) framework SecureGBM built-up with a multi-party computation model based on semi-homomorphic encryption, where every involved party can jointly obtain a shared Gradient Boosting machines model while protecting their own data from the potential privacy leakage and inferential identification. More specific, our work focused on a specific "dual--party" secure learning scenario based on two parties -- both party own an unique view (i.e., attributes or features) to the sample group of samples while only one party owns the labels. In such scenario, feature and label data are not allowed to share with others. To achieve the above goal, we firstly extent -- LightGBM -- a well known implementation of tree-based GBM through covering its key operations for training and inference with SEAL homomorphic encryption schemes. However, the performance of such re-implementation is significantly bottle-necked by the explosive inflation of the communication payloads, based on ciphertexts subject to the increasing length of plaintexts. In this way, we then proposed to use stochastic approximation techniques to reduced the communication payloads while accelerating the overall training procedure in a statistical manner. Our experiments using the real-world data showed that SecureGBM can well secure the communication and computation of LightGBM training and inference procedures for the both parties while only losing less than 3% AUC, using the same number of iterations for gradient boosting, on a wide range of benchmark datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Vertical Federated Learning: Concepts, Advances and Challengescited by 104
  2. 2021From Distributed Machine Learning to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 65
  3. 2022A Survey on Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 42
  4. 2023A Survey on Vertical Federated Learning: From a Layered Perspectivecited by 30
  5. 2023A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning with Perspectives on Security, Robustness, and Privacycited by 24
  6. 2024Vertical Federated Learning for Effectiveness, Security, Applicability: A Surveycited by 14
  7. 2021Fed-EINI: An Efficient and Interpretable Inference Framework for Decision Tree Ensembles in Federated Learningcited by 10
  8. 2021An Efficient Learning Framework For Federated XGBoost Using Secret Sharing And Distributed Optimizationcited by 9
  9. 2022Federated Boosted Decision Trees with Differential Privacycited by 9
  10. 2023VFLAIR: A Research Library and Benchmark for Vertical Federated Learningcited by 8
  11. 2024A Survey of Privacy Threats and Defense in Vertical Federated Learning: From Model Life Cycle Perspectivecited by 7
  12. 2021FLSys: Toward an Open Ecosystem for Federated Learning Mobile Appscited by 6
7 more
  1. 2021Efficient Batch Homomorphic Encryption for Vertically Federated XGBoostcited by 6
  2. 2022FedGBF: An efficient vertical federated learning framework via gradient boosting and baggingcited by 5
  3. 2021SoK: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Tree-based Model Learningcited by 4
  4. 2022Federated XGBoost on Sample-Wise Non-IID Datacited by 4
  5. 2024Hybrid FedGraph: An efficient hybrid federated learning algorithm using graph convolutional neural networkcited by 1
  6. 2024Histogram-Based Federated XGBoost using Minimal Variance Sampling for Federated Tabular Datacited by 1
  7. 2026Towards Explainable Federated Learning: Understanding the Impact of Differential Privacycited by 0