mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CostNet: An End-to-End Framework for Goal-Directed Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2210.01805 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a general framework concerned with an agent that seeks to maximize rewards in an environment. The learning typically happens through trial and error using explorative methods, such as epsilon-greedy. There are two approaches, model-based and model-free reinforcement learning, that show concrete results in several disciplines. Model-based RL learns a model of the environment for learning the policy while model-free approaches are fully explorative and exploitative without considering the underlying environment dynamics. Model-free RL works conceptually well in simulated environments, and empirical evidence suggests that trial and error lead to a near-optimal behavior with enough training. On the other hand, model-based RL aims to be sample efficient, and studies show that it requires far less training in the real environment for learning a good policy. A significant challenge with RL is that it relies on a well-defined reward function to work well for complex environments and such a reward function is challenging to define. Goal-Directed RL is an alternative method that learns an intrinsic reward function with emphasis on a few explored trajectories that reveals the path to the goal state. This paper introduces a novel reinforcement learning algorithm for predicting the distance between two states in a Markov Decision Process. The learned distance function works as an intrinsic reward that fuels the agent's learning. Using the distance-metric as a reward, we show that the algorithm performs comparably to model-free RL while having significantly better sample-efficiently in several test environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2022.

Builds on

17 of 28 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  3. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  4. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  5. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  6. 2019Generating Diverse High-Fidelity Images with VQ-VAE-2cited by 1,376
  7. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  8. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  9. 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 761
  10. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
  11. 2017AirSim: High-Fidelity Visual and Physical Simulation for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 517
  12. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Drivingcited by 401
5 more
  1. 2018Model-Ensemble Trust-Region Policy Optimizationcited by 214
  2. 2018Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 138
  3. 2018Deep RTS: A Game Environment for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Real-Time Strategy Gamescited by 7
  4. 2018The Dreaming Variational Autoencoder for Reinforcement Learning Environmentscited by 4
  5. 2019Accelerating Goal-Directed Reinforcement Learning by Model Characterizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.