Low-Rank Adversarial PGD Attack
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial attacks on deep neural network models have seen rapid development and are extensively used to study the stability of these networks. Among various adversarial strategies, Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) is a widely adopted method in computer vision due to its effectiveness and quick implementation, making it suitable for adversarial training. In this work, we observe that in many cases, the perturbations computed using PGD predominantly affect only a portion of the singular value spectrum of the original image, suggesting that these perturbations are approximately low-rank. Motivated by this observation, we propose a variation of PGD that efficiently computes a low-rank attack. We extensively validate our method on a range of standard models as well as robust models that have undergone adversarial training. Our analysis indicates that the proposed low-rank PGD can be effectively used in adversarial training due to its straightforward and fast implementation coupled with competitive performance. Notably, we find that low-rank PGD often performs comparably to, and sometimes even outperforms, the traditional full-rank PGD attack, while using significantly less memory.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
41 of 56 references.
References · 41
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 350
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
- 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 288
29 more
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
- 2018Generating Adversarial Examples with Adversarial Networkscited by 256
- 2015Tensorizing Neural Networkscited by 246
- 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
- 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
- 2018Adversarial Attack and Defense on Graph Data: A Surveycited by 166
- 2020Torchattacks: A PyTorch Repository for Adversarial Attackscited by 156
- 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
- 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
- 2019Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 123
- 2021Globally-Robust Neural Networkscited by 106
- 2019Sparse and Imperceivable Adversarial Attackscited by 95
- 2023A Comprehensive Study on Robustness of Image Classification Models: Benchmarking and Rethinkingcited by 85
- 2019Functional Adversarial Attackscited by 82
- 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
- 2022Frequency-driven Imperceptible Adversarial Attack on Semantic Similaritycited by 76
- 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
- 2018On the Suitability of Lp-norms for Creating and Preventing Adversarial Examplescited by 57
- 2019On the Effectiveness of Low Frequency Perturbationscited by 56
- 2022Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function Perspectivecited by 48
- 2022Low-rank lottery tickets: finding efficient low-rank neural networks via matrix differential equationscited by 42
- 2021A Frequency Perspective of Adversarial Robustnesscited by 28
- 2023Certified Robustness via Dynamic Margin Maximization and Improved Lipschitz Regularizationcited by 19
- 2022Improving Robustness with Adaptive Weight Decaycited by 13
- 2023Robust low-rank training via approximate orthonormal constraintscited by 12
- 2018Gray-box Adversarial Trainingcited by 10
- 2023Adversarial Ink: Componentwise Backward Error Attacks on Deep Learningcited by 7
- 2018Adversarial Training Versus Weight Decaycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025FSPGD: Rethinking Black-box Attacks on Semantic Segmentationcited by 0
- 2025Elytra: A Flexible Framework for Securing Large Vision Systemscited by 0
- 2026SRAW-Attack: Space-Reweighted Adversarial Warping Attack for SAR Target Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Low Rank Adaptation for Adversarial Perturbationcited by 0
- 2026Low Rank Adaptation for Adversarial Perturbation30 Apr 2026
- 2026SRAW-Attack: Space-Reweighted Adversarial Warping Attack for SAR Target Recognition15 Jan 2026
- 2025Elytra: A Flexible Framework for Securing Large Vision Systems31 May 2025
- 2025FSPGD: Rethinking Black-box Attacks on Semantic Segmentation3 Feb 2025