NPCFace: Negative-Positive Collaborative Training for Large-scale Face Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The training scheme of deep face recognition has greatly evolved in the past years, yet it encounters new challenges in the large-scale data situation where massive and diverse hard cases occur. Especially in the range of low false accept rate (FAR), there are various hard cases in both positives (intra-class) and negatives (inter-class). In this paper, we study how to make better use of these hard samples for improving the training. The literature approaches this by margin-based formulation in either positive logit or negative logits. However, the correlation between hard positive and hard negative is overlooked, and so is the relation between the margins in positive and negative logits. We find such correlation is significant, especially in the large-scale dataset, and one can take advantage from it to boost the training via relating the positive and negative margins for each training sample. To this end, we propose an explicit collaboration between positive and negative margins sample-wisely. Given a batch of hard samples, a novel Negative-Positive Collaboration loss, named NPCFace, is formulated, which emphasizes the training on both negative and positive hard cases via the collaborative-margin mechanism in the softmax logits, and also brings better interpretation of negative-positive hardness correlation. Besides, the emphasis is implemented with an improved formulation to achieve stable convergence and flexible parameter setting. We validate the effectiveness of our approach on various benchmarks of large-scale face recognition, and obtain advantageous results especially in the low FAR range.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systemscited by 7
- 2022FaceMAE: Privacy-Preserving Face Recognition via Masked Autoencoderscited by 6
- 2022Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristicscited by 6
- 2024Improving the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognition with Diverse Parameters Augmentationcited by 3
- 2022The More Secure, The Less Equally Usable: Gender and Ethnicity (Un)fairness of Deep Face Recognition along Security Thresholdscited by 2
- 2023(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distancecited by 1
- 2021Face-NMS: A Core-set Selection Approach for Efficient Face Recognitioncited by 0
- 2022A Comparative Analysis of the Face Recognition Methods in Video Surveillance Scenarioscited by 0
- 2023Seeing through the Mask: Multi-task Generative Mask Decoupling Face Recognitioncited by 0
- 2024Improving the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognition with Diverse Parameters Augmentation23 Nov 2024
- 2024Rethinking Impersonation and Dodging Attacks on Face Recognition Systems17 Jan 2024
- 2023Seeing through the Mask: Multi-task Generative Mask Decoupling Face Recognition20 Nov 2023
- 2023(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distance22 Aug 2023
- 2022A Comparative Analysis of the Face Recognition Methods in Video Surveillance Scenarios5 Nov 2022
- 2022The More Secure, The Less Equally Usable: Gender and Ethnicity (Un)fairness of Deep Face Recognition along Security Thresholds30 Sep 2022
- 2022Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristics23 Aug 2022
- 2022FaceMAE: Privacy-Preserving Face Recognition via Masked Autoencoders23 May 2022
- 2021Face-NMS: A Core-set Selection Approach for Efficient Face Recognition10 Sep 2021