mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transformer-based Models to Deal with Heterogeneous Environments in Human Activity Recognition

arXiv 2209.11750 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) on mobile devices has been demonstrated to be possible using neural models trained on data collected from the device's inertial measurement units. These models have used Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTMs), Transformers or a combination of these to achieve state-of-the-art results with real-time performance. However, these approaches have not been extensively evaluated in real-world situations where the input data may be different from the training data. This paper highlights the issue of data heterogeneity in machine learning applications and how it can hinder their deployment in pervasive settings. To address this problem, we propose and publicly release the code of two sensor-wise Transformer architectures called HART and MobileHART for Human Activity Recognition Transformer. Our experiments on several publicly available datasets show that these HART architectures outperform previous architectures with fewer floating point operations and parameters than conventional Transformers. The results also show they are more robust to changes in mobile position or device brand and hence better suited for the heterogeneous environments encountered in real-life settings. Finally, the source code has been made publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2022.

Builds on

25 of 51 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  8. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  9. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  10. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  11. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  12. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
13 more
  1. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
  2. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  3. 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 642
  4. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
  5. 2016FractalNet: Ultra-Deep Neural Networks without Residualscited by 216
  6. 2019Pay Less Attention with Lightweight and Dynamic Convolutionscited by 211
  7. 2020Lite Transformer with Long-Short Range Attentioncited by 127
  8. 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 126
  9. 2020Exploring Contrastive Learning in Human Activity Recognition for Healthcarecited by 75
  10. 2018Protecting Sensory Data against Sensitive Inferencescited by 45
  11. 2021A Federated Learning Aggregation Algorithm for Pervasive Computing: Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 31
  12. 2020Optimizing Transformer for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 24
  13. 2021An Overview of Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors: Healthcare and Artificial Intelligencecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

12 papers.