mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining Anomalies using Denoising Autoencoders for Financial Tabular Data

arXiv 2209.10658 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.CEcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in Explainable AI (XAI) increased the demand for deployment of safe and interpretable AI models in various industry sectors. Despite the latest success of deep neural networks in a variety of domains, understanding the decision-making process of such complex models still remains a challenging task for domain experts. Especially in the financial domain, merely pointing to an anomaly composed of often hundreds of mixed type columns, has limited value for experts. Hence, in this paper, we propose a framework for explaining anomalies using denoising autoencoders designed for mixed type tabular data. We specifically focus our technique on anomalies that are erroneous observations. This is achieved by localizing individual sample columns (cells) with potential errors and assigning corresponding confidence scores. In addition, the model provides the expected cell value estimates to fix the errors. We evaluate our approach based on three standard public tabular datasets (Credit Default, Adult, IEEE Fraud) and one proprietary dataset (Holdings). We find that denoising autoencoders applied to this task already outperform other approaches in the cell error detection rates as well as in the expected value rates. Additionally, we analyze how a specialized loss designed for cell error detection can further improve these metrics. Our framework is designed for a domain expert to understand abnormal characteristics of an anomaly, as well as to improve in-house data quality management processes.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2022.

Builds on

25 of 50 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  6. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
  7. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
  8. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  9. 2018Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoderscited by 263
  10. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 252
  11. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
  12. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 198
13 more
  1. 2018Handling Incomplete Heterogeneous Data using VAEscited by 148
  2. 2019GEE: A Gradient-based Explainable Variational Autoencoder for Network Anomaly Detectioncited by 36
  3. 2019Explaining Anomalies Detected by Autoencoders Using SHAPcited by 27
  4. 2018Towards Explaining Anomalies: A Deep Taylor Decomposition of One-Class Modelscited by 24
  5. 2020Model Agnostic Multilevel Explanationscited by 24
  6. 2019Shapley Values of Reconstruction Errors of PCA for Explaining Anomaly Detectioncited by 19
  7. 2017Detection of Anomalies in Large Scale Accounting Data using Deep Autoencoder Networkscited by 18
  8. 2019Robust Variational Autoencoders for Outlier Detection and Repair of Mixed-Type Datacited by 16
  9. 2018Scalable and Interpretable One-class SVMs with Deep Learning and Random Fourier featurescited by 14
  10. 2019Detection of Accounting Anomalies in the Latent Space using Adversarial Autoencoder Neural Networkscited by 13
  11. 2021Multi-view Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning of Accounting Data Representations for Downstream Audit Taskscited by 8
  12. 2017Solving the "false positives" problem in fraud predictioncited by 3
  13. 2019An Explainable Autoencoder For Collaborative Filtering Recommendationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

4 papers.