mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NeurOLight: A Physics-Agnostic Neural Operator Enabling Parametric Photonic Device Simulation

arXiv 2209.10098 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2022cs.ET cs.LG physics.opticscited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optical computing is an emerging technology for next-generation efficient artificial intelligence (AI) due to its ultra-high speed and efficiency. Electromagnetic field simulation is critical to the design, optimization, and validation of photonic devices and circuits. However, costly numerical simulation significantly hinders the scalability and turn-around time in the photonic circuit design loop. Recently, physics-informed neural networks have been proposed to predict the optical field solution of a single instance of a partial differential equation (PDE) with predefined parameters. Their complicated PDE formulation and lack of efficient parametrization mechanisms limit their flexibility and generalization in practical simulation scenarios. In this work, for the first time, a physics-agnostic neural operator-based framework, dubbed NeurOLight, is proposed to learn a family of frequency-domain Maxwell PDEs for ultra-fast parametric photonic device simulation. We balance the efficiency and generalization of NeurOLight via several novel techniques. Specifically, we discretize different devices into a unified domain, represent parametric PDEs with a compact wave prior, and encode the incident light via masked source modeling. We design our model with parameter-efficient cross-shaped NeurOLight blocks and adopt superposition-based augmentation for data-efficient learning. With these synergistic approaches, NeurOLight generalizes to a large space of unseen simulation settings, demonstrates 2-orders-of-magnitude faster simulation speed than numerical solvers, and outperforms prior neural network models by ~54% lower prediction error with ~44% fewer parameters. Our code is available at https://github.com/JeremieMelo/NeurOLight.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2022.

Builds on

16 of 43 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  2. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  3. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  4. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  5. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
  6. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
  7. 2021U-FNO -- An enhanced Fourier neural operator-based deep-learning model for multiphase flowcited by 292
  8. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 237
  9. 2021Multiwavelet-based Operator Learning for Differential Equationscited by 229
  10. 2020Photonics for artificial intelligence and neuromorphic computingcited by 111
  11. 2016Neuromorphic Silicon Photonic Networkscited by 66
  12. 2021CrossLight: A Cross-Layer Optimized Silicon Photonic Neural Network Acceleratorcited by 29
4 more
  1. 2020Rethinking Depthwise Separable Convolutions: How Intra-Kernel Correlations Lead to Improved MobileNetscited by 28
  2. 2021L2ight: Enabling On-Chip Learning for Optical Neural Networks via Efficient in-situ Subspace Optimizationcited by 21
  3. 2021A compact butterfly-style silicon photonic-electronic neural chip for hardware-efficient deep learningcited by 13
  4. 2021O-HAS: Optical Hardware Accelerator Search for Boosting Both Acceleration Performance and Development Speedcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 6.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 218
  2. 2023Neural oscillators for generalization of physics-informed machine learningcited by 9
  3. 2024Towards General Neural Surrogate Solvers with Specialized Neural Acceleratorscited by 8
  4. 2025Inverse Design in Nanophotonics via Representation Learningcited by 7
  5. 2024PACE: Pacing Operator Learning to Accurate Optical Field Simulation for Complicated Photonic Devicescited by 5
  6. 2024Separable Operator Networkscited by 4
  7. 2024PIC2O-Sim: A Physics-Inspired Causality-Aware Dynamic Convolutional Neural Operator for Ultra-Fast Photonic Device FDTD Simulationcited by 2
  8. 2025MAPS: Multi-Fidelity AI-Augmented Photonic Simulation and Inverse Design Infrastructurecited by 2
  9. 2026Report for NSF Workshop on AI for Electronic Design Automationcited by 1
  10. 2024Generalizing Deep Surrogate Solvers for Broadband Electromagnetic Field Prediction at Unseen Wavelengthscited by 0
  11. 2025Machine-Learning-Assisted Photonic Device Development: A Multiscale Approach from Theory to Characterizationcited by 0
  12. 2025Democratizing Electronic-Photonic AI Systems: An Open-Source AI-Infused Cross-Layer Co-Design and Design Automation Toolflowcited by 0
5 more
  1. 2026Harnessing Photonics for Machine Intelligencecited by 0
  2. 2026Fast Reconstruction of Exact Maxwell Dynamics from Sparse Datacited by 0
  3. 2026APEX: Amplitude Anchors and Phase Priors for Target-Scarce Higher-Frequency Wave Predictioncited by 0
  4. 2026Will Accurate Fields Mislead Photonic Design? FromGlobal Accuracy to Port Readoutcited by 0
  5. 2026DDSNet: Dual-domain Symmetry-aware Network for PCSEL Property Predictioncited by 0