mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PIC2O-Sim: A Physics-Inspired Causality-Aware Dynamic Convolutional Neural Operator for Ultra-Fast Photonic Device FDTD Simulation

arXiv 2406.17810 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2024physics.comp-ph cs.AI physics.opticscited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, which is important in photonic hardware design flow, is widely adopted to solve time-domain Maxwell equations. However, FDTD is known for its prohibitive runtime cost, taking minutes to hours to simulate a single device. Recently, AI has been applied to realize orders-of-magnitude speedup in partial differential equation (PDE) solving. However, AI-based FDTD solvers for photonic devices have not been clearly formulated. Directly applying off-the-shelf models to predict the optical field dynamics shows unsatisfying fidelity and efficiency since the model primitives are agnostic to the unique physical properties of Maxwell equations and lack algorithmic customization. In this work, we thoroughly investigate the synergy between neural operator designs and the physical property of Maxwell equations and introduce a physics-inspired AI-based FDTD prediction framework PIC2O-Sim which features a causality-aware dynamic convolutional neural operator as its backbone model that honors the space-time causality constraints via careful receptive field configuration and explicitly captures the permittivity-dependent light propagation behavior via an efficient dynamic convolution operator. Meanwhile, we explore the trade-offs among prediction scalability, fidelity, and efficiency via a multi-stage partitioned time-bundling technique in autoregressive prediction. Multiple key techniques have been introduced to mitigate iterative error accumulation while maintaining efficiency advantages during autoregressive field prediction. Extensive evaluations on three challenging photonic device simulation tasks have shown the superiority of our PIC2O-Sim method, showing 51.2% lower roll-out prediction error, 23.5 times fewer parameters than state-of-the-art neural operators, providing 300-600x higher simulation speed than an open-source FDTD numerical solver.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

Builds on

15 of 25 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 368
  4. 2021Factorized Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 237
  5. 2022U-NO: U-shaped Neural Operatorscited by 219
  6. 2021PAConv: Position Adaptive Convolution with Dynamic Kernel Assembling on Point Cloudscited by 211
  7. 2022FourCastNet: Accelerating Global High-Resolution Weather Forecasting using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 188
  8. 2019Pixel-Adaptive Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 126
  9. 2019Wave Physics as an Analog Recurrent Neural Networkcited by 42
  10. 2023Koopman neural operator as a mesh-free solver of non-linear partial differential equationscited by 29
  11. 2023A neural operator-based surrogate solver for free-form electromagnetic inverse designcited by 18
  12. 2022NeurOLight: A Physics-Agnostic Neural Operator Enabling Parametric Photonic Device Simulationcited by 17
3 more
  1. 2023Real-time Inference and Extrapolation via a Diffusion-inspired Temporal Transformer Operator (DiTTO)cited by 16
  2. 2024SineNet: Learning Temporal Dynamics in Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equationscited by 13
  3. 2023Understanding the Efficacy of U-Net & Vision Transformer for Groundwater Numerical Modellingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.