Full-waveform earthquake source inversion using simulation-based inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a novel framework for full-waveform seismic source inversion using simulation-based inference (SBI). Traditional probabilistic approaches often rely on simplifying assumptions about data errors, which we show can lead to inaccurate uncertainty quantification. SBI addresses this limitation by building an empirical probabilistic model of the data errors using machine learning models, known as neural density estimators, which can then be integrated into the Bayesian inference framework. We apply the SBI framework to point-source moment tensor inversions as well as joint moment tensor and time-location inversions. We construct a range of synthetic examples to explore the quality of the SBI solutions, as well as to compare the SBI results with standard Gaussian likelihood-based Bayesian inversions. We then demonstrate that under real seismic noise, common Gaussian likelihood assumptions for treating full-waveform data yield overconfident posterior distributions that underestimate the moment tensor component uncertainties by up to a factor of 3. We contrast this with SBI, which produces well-calibrated posteriors that generally agree with the true seismic source parameters, and offers an order-of-magnitude reduction in the number of simulations required to perform inference compared to standard Monte Carlo techniques. Finally, we apply our methodology to a pair of moderate magnitude earthquakes in the North Atlantic. We utilise seismic waveforms recorded by the recent UPFLOW ocean bottom seismometer array as well as by regional land stations in the Azores, comparing full moment tensor and source-time location posteriors between SBI and a Gaussian likelihood approach. We find that our adaptation of SBI can be directly applied to real earthquake sources to efficiently produce high quality posterior distributions that significantly improve upon Gaussian likelihood approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 141 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2024.
Builds on
18 of 141 references.
References · 18
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 502
- 2015MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimationcited by 307
- 2018Sequential Neural Likelihood: Fast Likelihood-free Inference with Autoregressive Flowscited by 221
- 2021Benchmarking Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 162
- 2016Neural Autoregressive Distribution Estimationcited by 95
- 2021Real-time gravitational-wave science with neural posterior estimationcited by 78
- 2015Bayesian Optimization for Likelihood-Free Inference of Simulator-Based Statistical Modelscited by 61
6 more
- 2018Likelihood-free inference with emulator networkscited by 61
- 2018Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inferencecited by 60
- 2023Sampling-Based Accuracy Testing of Posterior Estimators for General Inferencecited by 46
- 2022Earthquake Phase Association with Graph Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2021Towards fast machine-learning-assisted Bayesian posterior inference of microseismic event location and source mechanismcited by 1
- 2021Emerging Directions in Geophysical Inversioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.