mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Personalized Federated Learning with Communication Compression

arXiv 2209.05148 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In contrast to training traditional machine learning (ML) models in data centers, federated learning (FL) trains ML models over local datasets contained on resource-constrained heterogeneous edge devices. Existing FL algorithms aim to learn a single global model for all participating devices, which may not be helpful to all devices participating in the training due to the heterogeneity of the data across the devices. Recently, Hanzely and Richt'arik (2020) proposed a new formulation for training personalized FL models aimed at balancing the trade-off between the traditional global model and the local models that could be trained by individual devices using their private data only. They derived a new algorithm, called Loopless Gradient Descent (L2GD), to solve it and showed that this algorithms leads to improved communication complexity guarantees in regimes when more personalization is required. In this paper, we equip their L2GD algorithm with a bidirectional compression mechanism to further reduce the communication bottleneck between the local devices and the server. Unlike other compression-based algorithms used in the FL-setting, our compressed L2GD algorithm operates on a probabilistic communication protocol, where communication does not happen on a fixed schedule. Moreover, our compressed L2GD algorithm maintains a similar convergence rate as vanilla SGD without compression. To empirically validate the efficiency of our algorithm, we perform diverse numerical experiments on both convex and non-convex problems and using various compression techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 67 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2022.

Builds on

67 of 88 references.

References · 67

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  6. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  7. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  8. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  9. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
  10. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
  11. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
  12. 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
38 more
  1. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
  2. 2019Federated Learning with Personalization Layerscited by 533
  3. 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 462
  4. 2018Sparsified SGD with Memorycited by 373
  5. 2020Adaptive Personalized Federated Learningcited by 353
  6. 2019FedPAQ: A Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Method with Periodic Averaging and Quantizationcited by 349
  7. 2020FedML: A Research Library and Benchmark for Federated Machine Learningcited by 298
  8. 2019Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Datacited by 266
  9. 2017TernGrad: Ternary Gradients to Reduce Communication in Distributed Deep Learningcited by 253
  10. 2017Sparse Communication for Distributed Gradient Descentcited by 243
  11. 2019PowerSGD: Practical Low-Rank Gradient Compression for Distributed Optimizationcited by 234
  12. 2018The Convergence of Sparsified Gradient Methodscited by 228
  13. 2019Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communicationcited by 218
  14. 2021Personalized Federated Learning using Hypernetworkscited by 210
  15. 2020Federated Learning of a Mixture of Global and Local Modelscited by 208
  16. 2019SGD: General Analysis and Improved Ratescited by 206
  17. 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 201
  18. 2020Personalized Federated Learning with First Order Model Optimizationcited by 201
  19. 2019Qsparse-local-SGD: Distributed SGD with Quantization, Sparsification, and Local Computationscited by 179
  20. 2019On the Linear Speedup Analysis of Communication Efficient Momentum SGD for Distributed Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 178
  21. 2020Federated Learning with Compression: Unified Analysis and Sharp Guaranteescited by 159
  22. 2020Survey of Personalization Techniques for Federated Learningcited by 144
  23. 2020On Biased Compression for Distributed Learningcited by 140
  24. 2018ATOMO: Communication-efficient Learning via Atomic Sparsificationcited by 135
  25. 2016Distributed Mean Estimation with Limited Communicationcited by 134
  26. 2013Communication Efficient Distributed Optimization using an Approximate Newton-type Methodcited by 131
  27. 2022Federated Learning with Partial Model Personalizationcited by 114
  28. 2020Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast Improvementscited by 112
  29. 2019Local SGD with Periodic Averaging: Tighter Analysis and Adaptive Synchronizationcited by 106
  30. 2019DoubleSqueeze: Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Double-Pass Error-Compensated Compressioncited by 98
  31. 2018LAG: Lazily Aggregated Gradient for Communication-Efficient Distributed Learningcited by 95
  32. 2022Layer-wised Model Aggregation for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 95
  33. 2017On the convergence properties of a K-step averaging stochastic gradient descent algorithm for nonconvex optimizationcited by 91
  34. 2014Deep learning with Elastic Averaging SGDcited by 90
  35. 2019Natural Compression for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 88
  36. 2020Local SGD: Unified Theory and New Efficient Methodscited by 88
  37. 2019First Analysis of Local GD on Heterogeneous Datacited by 80
  38. 2018Benchmark Analysis of Representative Deep Neural Network Architecturescited by 77

50 most cited of 67 All 67 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

6 papers.