Machine Learning-based Automatic Annotation and Detection of COVID-19 Fake News
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
COVID-19 impacted every part of the world, although the misinformation about the outbreak traveled faster than the virus. Misinformation spread through online social networks (OSN) often misled people from following correct medical practices. In particular, OSN bots have been a primary source of disseminating false information and initiating cyber propaganda. Existing work neglects the presence of bots that act as a catalyst in the spread and focuses on fake news detection in 'articles shared in posts' rather than the post (textual) content. Most work on misinformation detection uses manually labeled datasets that are hard to scale for building their predictive models. In this research, we overcome this challenge of data scarcity by proposing an automated approach for labeling data using verified fact-checked statements on a Twitter dataset. In addition, we combine textual features with user-level features (such as followers count and friends count) and tweet-level features (such as number of mentions, hashtags and urls in a tweet) to act as additional indicators to detect misinformation. Moreover, we analyzed the presence of bots in tweets and show that bots change their behavior over time and are most active during the misinformation campaign. We collected 10.22 Million COVID-19 related tweets and used our annotation model to build an extensive and original ground truth dataset for classification purposes. We utilize various machine learning models to accurately detect misinformation and our best classification model achieves precision (82%), recall (96%), and false positive rate (3.58%). Also, our bot analysis indicates that bots generated approximately 10% of misinformation tweets. Our methodology results in substantial exposure of false information, thus improving the trustworthiness of information disseminated through social media platforms.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2022.
Builds on
18 of 45 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 361
- 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 334
- 2018FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Mediacited by 281
- 2020Fighting an Infodemic: COVID-19 Fake News Datasetcited by 82
- 2017The spread of low-credibility content by social botscited by 73
- 2020The COVID-19 Social Media Infodemiccited by 64
- 2019Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selectioncited by 59
- 2020Where Are the Facts? Searching for Fact-checked Information to Alleviate the Spread of Fake Newscited by 48
- 2020A large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter dataset for open scientific research -- an international collaborationcited by 33
- 2020Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifierscited by 32
6 more
- 2018Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaigncited by 30
- 2019Weak Supervision for Fake News Detection via Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
- 2022Botometer 101: Social bot practicum for computational social scientistscited by 25
- 2021Cross-SEAN: A Cross-Stitch Semi-Supervised Neural Attention Model for COVID-19 Fake News Detectioncited by 15
- 2021Multimodal Fake News Detectioncited by 14
- 2016The Rise of Social Botnets: Attacks and Countermeasurescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.