mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Forensicability Assessment of Questioned Images in Recapturing Detection

arXiv 2209.01935 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2022cs.CV cs.MMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recapture detection of face and document images is an important forensic task. With deep learning, the performances of face anti-spoofing (FAS) and recaptured document detection have been improved significantly. However, the performances are not yet satisfactory on samples with weak forensic cues. The amount of forensic cues can be quantified to allow a reliable forensic result. In this work, we propose a forensicability assessment network to quantify the forensicability of the questioned samples. The low-forensicability samples are rejected before the actual recapturing detection process to improve the efficiency of recapturing detection systems. We first extract forensicability features related to both image quality assessment and forensic tasks. By exploiting domain knowledge of the forensic application in image quality and forensic features, we define three task-specific forensicability classes and the initialized locations in the feature space. Based on the extracted features and the defined centers, we train the proposed forensic assessment network (FANet) with cross-entropy loss and update the centers with a momentum-based update method. We integrate the trained FANet with practical recapturing detection schemes in face anti-spoofing and recaptured document detection tasks. Experimental results show that, for a generic CNN-based FAS scheme, FANet reduces the EERs from 33.75% to 19.23% under ROSE to IDIAP protocol by rejecting samples with the lowest 30% forensicability scores. The performance of FAS schemes is poor in the rejected samples, with EER as high as 56.48%. Similar performances in rejecting low-forensicability samples have been observed for the state-of-the-art approaches in FAS and recaptured document detection tasks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that assesses the forensicability of recaptured document images and improves the system efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2022.

Builds on

12 of 34 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  3. 2018Learning Deep Models for Face Anti-Spoofing: Binary or Auxiliary Supervisioncited by 167
  4. 2021On Feature Collapse and Deep Kernel Learning for Single Forward Pass Uncertaintycited by 87
  5. 2014Learn Convolutional Neural Network for Face Anti-Spoofingcited by 80
  6. 2020DRL-FAS: A Novel Framework Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Face Anti-Spoofingcited by 25
  7. 2021Deep Learning-based Forgery Attack on Document Imagescited by 14
  8. 2021Quality Measures in Biometric Systemscited by 12
  9. 2021A Comparative Study of Fingerprint Image-Quality Estimation Methodscited by 8
  10. 2021Asymmetric Modality Translation For Face Presentation Attack Detectioncited by 4
  11. 2021Domain Generalization for Document Authentication against Practical Recapturing Attackscited by 2
  12. 2022Robust Face Anti-Spoofing with Dual Probabilistic Modelingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.