Background Invariance Testing According to Semantic Proximity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many applications, machine-learned (ML) models are required to hold some invariance qualities, such as rotation, size, and intensity invariance. Among these, testing for background invariance presents a significant challenge due to the vast and complex data space it encompasses. To evaluate invariance qualities, we first use a visualization-based testing framework which allows human analysts to assess and make informed decisions about the invariance properties of ML models. We show that such informative testing framework is preferred as ML models with the same global statistics (e.g., accuracy scores) can behave differently and have different visualized testing patterns. However, such human analysts might not lead to consistent decisions without a systematic sampling approach to select representative testing suites. In this work, we present a technical solution for selecting background scenes according to their semantic proximity to a target image that contains a foreground object being tested. We construct an ontology for storing knowledge about relationships among different objects using association analysis. This ontology enables an efficient and meaningful search for background scenes of different semantic distances to a target image, enabling the selection of a test suite that is both diverse and reasonable. Compared with other testing techniques, e.g., random sampling, nearest neighbors, or other sampled test suites by visual-language models (VLMs), our method achieved a superior balance between diversity and consistency of human annotations, thereby enhancing the reliability and comprehensiveness of background invariance testing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2022.
Builds on
22 of 59 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 762
- 2022Blended Latent Diffusioncited by 430
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
- 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
10 more
- 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 252
- 2017Spatial As Deep: Spatial CNN for Traffic Scene Understandingcited by 187
- 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
- 2020Bridging Composite and Real: Towards End-to-end Deep Image Mattingcited by 89
- 2018TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzingcited by 67
- 2020Robustness to Spurious Correlations in Text Classification via Automatically Generated Counterfactualscited by 67
- 20203D Human Pose Estimation using Spatio-Temporal Networks with Explicit Occlusion Trainingcited by 54
- 2019PedHunter: Occlusion Robust Pedestrian Detector in Crowded Scenescited by 30
- 2018Indoor Scene Understanding in 2.5/3D for Autonomous Agents: A Surveycited by 25
- 2021ML4ML: Automated Invariance Testing for Machine Learning Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Towards the Human Global Context: Does the Vision-Language Model Really Judge Like a Human Being?
- 2026SABRE: Scalable and Automated Benchmarking of VLMs under Stress
- 2025Language-Guided Invariance Probing of Vision-Language Models
- 2024A-Bench: Are LMMs Masters at Evaluating AI-generated Images?
- 2026Retrieving Counterfactuals Improves Visual In-Context Learning
- 2026ViSTR-Bench: Can MLLMs Reason from Continuous Visual Cues in Dynamic Scenes?
- 2025SpatialViz-Bench: A Cognitively-Grounded Benchmark for Diagnosing Spatial Visualization in MLLMs
- 2026VISTA: Video Interaction Spatio-Temporal Analysis Benchmark